Re: [Roll] [roll] #166 (applicability-home-building): Manageability

[peter van der Stok <[e-mail]>]

HI Yvonne,

we propose the following text for section 6.
At this moment it is not clear how homenets will be managed. 
Consequently it is not clear which tools will be used and which 
parameters must be exposed for management.
In building control, management is mandatory. It is expected that 
installations will be managed using the set of currently available tools 
(including IETF tools like MIBS, NETCONF modules, DHCP and others) with 
large differences between the ways an installation is managed.

Greetings,

Peter

roll issue tracker schreef op 2014-11-10 23:14:
> #166: Manageability
> 
>  Yvonne-Anne Pignolet:
>  About Section 6, why would manageability be out of scope for home
>  network scenarios? And can you give more detail on what central
>  control based on MIBs entails?
> 
>  Peter van der Stok:
>  I think the whole discussion on how home networks are managed is still 
> on
>  going.
>  And what to manage is also not clear. For example: will the ISP set 
> the
>  RPL parameter values in the nodes in my home and acquire statistics on
>  packet fragmentation?
> 
>  In building automation, setting configuration parameters seems 
> necessary
>  (for example the MPL parameter values). Some people think this should 
> be
>  done via DHCP. So removing the last phrase of section 6 will improve 
> the
>  clarity.
> 
>  Yvonne-Anne Pignolet:
>  In this case it would be good to mention that home network management 
> is
>  still under discussion.