Re: [Roll] Path Control Bits handling issue in 6550
Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 14 September 2020 15:59 UTC
Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CC23A0C2E for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IRpvdvWqbHqJ for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8F43A0C26 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id k14so118329edo.1 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WsjG4iH35kzAT+9O0v6ItFk0v0Cn2Rc5LjTAMUS31LY=; b=c0fuHXHbLMy3H3/jaYhUpfgoYVUpiTtJ8bD/XNnF3S4hyw5yvYmTNVT4YN0a7aEzFi O/p/rDQlpDoKSD4Bj53QznncTirov9H4ZGwXMZf6N5EkkE99yYHtd5X96BZi2n+vPnd0 MkWyhjiIDHCKeK1j/Mh9Gmho8Zh5/03zYmLFqdEWOKUEhqz+9gPoTIkxWfJHOPgEJZe9 WNJ5pnFPmbcRtDh7CBezFag7VkswKXAvJIIh4xrCpDKPlrXKonExey4Csxe2wdYpiAwt 6xd1elkpXDGB/WUBoH7U3lcqYjD2w8Jtz/wmEOnX5fsC0s2X/BdCyb2GlFJEZU3TtsiI JBgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=WsjG4iH35kzAT+9O0v6ItFk0v0Cn2Rc5LjTAMUS31LY=; b=PuwwlpCdo6KB+vky4SfzyqVO7ZHzl5DeBcChrwxm5aKFE2ZDw0sZn2xaYUdGk7ntXS pwkA9GWEZ1XA7J03poeO6Rk0jKlpL2p1y9XZH9wsh1MB4SLuzqdd0LYcnQ88vky9xlcr fdLm7bVbbSqLLfcBxuXg4MCzATc2PHy1AZglTmVOluQ8lyV+QFTXTvwkv9sc9GVrDTSn ioEpGe1tyfRxpSxyQFwT1WxjyTOK70hhPKTptfv0Bj3ac510xSvpQJYu//J8TupGSW6n ezMR88fhLBgnCWSDY/BMeQ4yWHkFtCOX/x9INjBfUxJDFabhEvkP4w/JIbrazgHqaDzF w+2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531JBPbeoNZ8WhxJg/l7Wj03dXoDySPKZBJSOrtFciocydcY+9Zl uXmQu1ZhuzXCq0T2Xf+tutuHiicZ+tTr8PaCoQ4ZCXz2H/z7tw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZ9FeP7PKhKn25AImduZfwJJ/2rnPzQv+td4Lm2e9miOSMC7YWGsOXKfoods+vFXoD6rPac1yIfzJHqimTmxs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1819:: with SMTP id g25mr17374181edy.292.1600099146326; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR11MB356557D3DA819D8D788A0CE1D8230@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <30698.1600095585@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <30698.1600095585@localhost>
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 21:28:55 +0530
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp3sJg-6C0SWTF=d2CVwt-snVgSVAraHQhmbD7K3Qh7-Ow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000038e46805af481d7f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Z24KEC-aw52wLx3RQ-7Qj6fwRes>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Path Control Bits handling issue in 6550
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:59:10 -0000
> > Yes, I believe that the points in observations need to be addressed. > > I started this for the Path Control Bits handling issue in 6550. > > can you explain what you mean bby Path Control Bits? > Is "T" one of those bits? > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6550#section-9.9 explains Path Control. The DIO(Config Option) in the control plane carries PCS bits... Also the DAO(TIO) carries Path control related information. The strange part is very few really understand Path Control ... No open source implements it. But it occupies a good amount of real estate in 6550. > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Roll mailing list > Roll@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll >
- [Roll] Path Control Bits handling issue in 6550 Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Path Control Bits handling issue in 65… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Path Control Bits handling issue in 65… Rahul Jadhav
- Re: [Roll] Path Control Bits handling issue in 65… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Path Control Bits handling issue in 65… Michael Richardson