Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 29 March 2013 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AE121F8FDC for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 03:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.537
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5KOtE6KbbwqC for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 03:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED1B21F8F1E for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 03:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2TAw8Kl008565 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:58:08 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2TAw7H8008551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:58:07 GMT
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks'" <roll@ietf.org>
References: <1775590041.43590.1363841747387.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <24467.1363877184@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <24467.1363877184@sandelman.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:58:08 -0000
Message-ID: <00bd01ce2c6c$4c9a16e0$e5ce44a0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIhz/t+oC75I4BvrT70VQ84+CtTnAHDuqAlmAcaLOA=
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:58:10 -0000

Hi,

Thanks, Michael for taking the care to ask the question, below.
I have waited a week and have heard only form you and Mukul, both saying that
you don't think the changes affect real use cases for today.

So I will now go ahead and resume processing of the document.

Thanks to all, and especially Mukul, for getting the issues resolved.

Cheers,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Michael
> Richardson
> Sent: 21 March 2013 14:46
> To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
> Subject: Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt
> 
> 
> >>>>> "Mukul" == Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>; writes:
>     Mukul> Hi all
> 
>     Mukul> Besides a number of editorial changes, the new version (-17)
>     Mukul> has the following key changes over the previous version:
> 
> Thank you Mukul, for persuing this process with the IESG reviewers.
> 
> My opinion is that much of this should have happened in sight of the WG,
> but there is some changing IESG view as to how to do this.
> 
> I'd like to ask the WG to think strongly about the changes that have
> occurred.    Do they affect your current or future usage of P2P?
> 
> If they do, then I think we need to talk about whether this means you
> will write an enhancement document... reminding that P2P is going
> forward as Experimental.  Likely it will switch tracks in 12 months once
> there is some significant deployment reports.
> 
> We are in IESG review process, and we aren't doing another WGLC on
> this.  My opinion is that none of the things changed affect real use
> cases that people currently deploying care about.
> 
> (and also thanks to the other authors)
> 
> (And remind that we a WGLC on mcast-trickle, aka "MPL" aka "Mipple")
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>;, Sandelman Software Works
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/