Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Thanks, Michael for taking the care to ask the question, below.
I have waited a week and have heard only form you and Mukul, both saying that
you don't think the changes affect real use cases for today.

So I will now go ahead and resume processing of the document.

Thanks to all, and especially Mukul, for getting the issues resolved.

Cheers,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
Michael
> Richardson
> Sent: 21 March 2013 14:46
> To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
> Subject: Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt
> 
> 
> >>>>> "Mukul" == Mukul Goyal <[e-mail]> writes:
>     Mukul> Hi all
> 
>     Mukul> Besides a number of editorial changes, the new version (-17)
>     Mukul> has the following key changes over the previous version:
> 
> Thank you Mukul, for persuing this process with the IESG reviewers.
> 
> My opinion is that much of this should have happened in sight of the WG,
> but there is some changing IESG view as to how to do this.
> 
> I'd like to ask the WG to think strongly about the changes that have
> occurred.    Do they affect your current or future usage of P2P?
> 
> If they do, then I think we need to talk about whether this means you
> will write an enhancement document... reminding that P2P is going
> forward as Experimental.  Likely it will switch tracks in 12 months once
> there is some significant deployment reports.
> 
> We are in IESG review process, and we aren't doing another WGLC on
> this.  My opinion is that none of the things changed affect real use
> cases that people currently deploying care about.
> 
> (and also thanks to the other authors)
> 
> (And remind that we a WGLC on mcast-trickle, aka "MPL" aka "Mipple")
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/