IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Last Call on MOP for AODV-RPL

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Wed, 20 October 2021 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43A93A0AE7 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y4xMwR9KrEXo for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x932.google.com (mail-ua1-x932.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::932]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720493A0AD7 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x932.google.com with SMTP id e10so8125852uab.3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rtwJ8fVCJvLzB7gvlzvpxY9JY+hpO4Bv/qUcy3Io9zc=; b=Xb3ltq66oy0BZRrObIm649pVsKkg4ZCEeE1y12FSdSVWg1H6uUJiqwQ2pLoZc7m4aU ULZ32JFPXXparXJmOC0uZu+K+nRpeYIT3tm8CDdbCUNHhk7Dc+M92qCeZLRANXVlVbnm k4fqLZX76Z1ruLF46LGf9z2aO5KDMg56b9XZ803fhRt+rSui92lwb7pEJjhXmc4VNKzg M3H2Vk0eCdmLY1Yd+iKqVJzfIHZCFs2teDO+wd+AAjkgYEWJ/P7w1dGeJKXngAblffKb 8L4W5JOGNdAf2wNp9z+N4jO47hU3UduhhlPP9KEWU3JgBymDlL7l/8ahcJHnM5Sd7TsF WI2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rtwJ8fVCJvLzB7gvlzvpxY9JY+hpO4Bv/qUcy3Io9zc=; b=h0Y7rSvXq8+twxiH9Fjqb+f2dx0TMR8R4qkXtz3FeyjH6Hi7dCyd3F9zYwkgGhYQBk Qm053Vl6R04g0JUSfkdbOXHGqS9xOlGxAuRLV69QR9ZS4k3JTNcOlECk6RWROKpWF8fw pTgquQ4JllsLp3IyHTSoSPzSOFcO01CgTXR0DA0yno3EVWJoy75BJxg5j0g9RhlHgyn5 HIRw+s8bAlfjkfZEAngRG6fsdvOROVOlUwNh5OmKwzrPZHRzNF4d7UKuuLiyLJAMSDE3 zkt7l4fzW4v03eyeXzSZjswHclvG8s7QP76MPMzTS6SRGlNXaK6HCYjMRAlLluSxOL9s JLTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308p3j8tRTrXRsoHkRhADfrmWyWYMtn62m/0LgwJCXQ61XTjtnP aX/ahBSGceYVer/NYxPm0WpgOwFvKuj/ik280izTBgF3
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxgwefYC4SmFjAyiwCOdk3wW2/HP6dId5sB3PRis/cTOrIJCmqiJv7Ern6Lcq1ZtJxqyj7tXK4Gk6ehGjjlOk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:370f:: with SMTP id s15mr896733vst.41.1634751092877; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO1PR11MB48817BF59C64D77794A43F36D8B09@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxLxfNdPE+s11DqiwDuXg7auwVc953kgC_EZ28bugEWrA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+sJUc=iDZAsMUw0L+H-orAKUWxxmm9hyerMS71Tjje0Smi+g@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88bgDUuitoVhtbk8qTdMJcYVzocWybRcAZsGhKEsd9uLg@mail.gmail.com> <4422.1634681303@localhost> <CADnDZ8_4LBaKsj3oP3h8xbfD28--Fvg0a_SMb4J-8t3dyEzDYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8_4LBaKsj3oP3h8xbfD28--Fvg0a_SMb4J-8t3dyEzDYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:30:57 +0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUfFd5YbD8nF1M4dUKKCaHGnsGRbrFmRnct_2APWzmjnDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002feca705cecc26f2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/ZOjn1WY8q7y-YwvAedooOJvsedI>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Last Call on MOP for AODV-RPL
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 17:31:46 -0000

Thank you Abdussalam and Michael for your comments, we will consider them.
I understand that Michael was referring to the Mailing list discussions,
where it was highlighted that P2P_RPL is not widely deployed.  Please let
us know if you are aware of some deployment.

BR,
Ines





On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 5:57 PM Abdussalam Baryun <
abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:08 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     > I think it is better to assign AODV_RPL using 5. Not sure why just
>>     > because not much used P2P_RPL we change to another protocol, is this
>>     > option taken often in IETF WGs.
>>
>> Until we do RPL v2 with MOPEX, we'll have only 1 MOP value left (6).
>> AODV_RPL replaces/upgrades P2P_RPL.
>> We think that P2P_RPL isn't widely deployed.
>>
>> I replied to the request of WG chair asking what WG thinks.
> The AD commented before that there was not much discussion in WG which is
> negative sign.
> It is still difficult to notice what the WG thinks, so not sure what you
> mean by We_think.
>
> AB
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email