Re: [Roll] No path DAO problem stmt draft

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 04 March 2016 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552F21A6F42 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:56:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hh-jPZD3l1OX for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 592981A6F9F for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261DF200A5 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:58:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD7863755 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:56:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5CEC8E5C@blreml510-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5CEC8E5C@blreml510-mbs.china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 12:56:45 -0500
Message-ID: <18033.1457114205@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/ZQNXevw-cZPGZqvypWOheNugKdY>
Subject: Re: [Roll] No path DAO problem stmt draft
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 17:56:48 -0000

Rahud, thank you for the ID.
I took a quick read.

You have identified a problem; at this point are you just seeking
confirmation that it's a real problem, after which you might propose a
solution?

The subject of rechartering to do RPL maintenance will be a major
agenda item at IETF95.  The rechartering as proposed would definitely cover
your work.   Our AD has indicated that he will support the rechartering once
the current work items are done.

(That's a hint: we need more comments and ideas on for useofrpi...)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/