Re: [Roll] Ralph's DISCUSS on MRHOF spec

Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu> Fri, 29 June 2012 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B2621F8855 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.227
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_62=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tlPbsDnGU-OI for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [129.7.240.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C1221F88A3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BD623CA99 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:05:59 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.uh.edu
Received: from dijkstra.cs.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48YCfNthmuQn for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:05:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from it.cs.uh.edu (www2.cs.uh.edu [129.7.240.6]) by dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AC223CAAD for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:05:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by it.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD592A280CE for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:05:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so5097825pbc.31 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.194.201 with SMTP id hy9mr8881249pbc.69.1340996758355; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.9.202 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <283139735.80026.1340996412381.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
References: <CAErDfUTf-0VFhrAe+Dkbrq68K4XHmwQRw0_KKq5DsCd-PKEWOA@mail.gmail.com> <283139735.80026.1340996412381.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
From: Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:05:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAErDfUQ+EULihUq_-i2S8JAirR2i5w7Ac5KhKqWGhhCr9LRnAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, Stiemerling Martin <mstiemerling@googlemail.com>, roll <roll@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Ralph's DISCUSS on MRHOF spec
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:06:03 -0000

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> wrote:
>>It is clear that we will benefit by explicitly stating how to tell
> what metric+OF is used in the network. Unless there is any objection,
> I will will proceed with the explanation that metric selection is
> indicated by the presence of the metric in the container and OF
> selection by OCP. For example, MRHOF(ETX) will use OF for MRHOF and
> ETX will be in the metric container.
>
> I agree except that, for MRHOF, absence of a metric container means that ETX is the metric in use.

Agree. Thanks for the reminder.

- om_p