[Roll] your comments on rpl implementation and deployment
Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu> Mon, 03 September 2012 14:21 UTC
Return-Path: <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DE121F863C for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.611, BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ahbrDxOim7WJ for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [129.7.240.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C384021F8630 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D905D23CA7D for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:21:19 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.uh.edu
Received: from dijkstra.cs.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bay3BOQykhX4 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:21:17 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from it.cs.uh.edu (www2.cs.uh.edu [129.7.240.6]) by dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A2623CA78 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:21:17 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by it.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9220F2A280BF for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:25:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so6292224vbb.31 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.85.165 with SMTP id i5mr2276614vez.5.1346682081852; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.198.41 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:21:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CAErDfUQKH0n2wkRDyqof_XpWOLEHmEJ5e+kjp3m36xOfMU_+QA@mail.gmail.com>
To: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [Roll] your comments on rpl implementation and deployment
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:21:36 -0000
I am planning to update draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations in the next few days. I will add something about leaf nodes. It will be great to also hear from rest of the WG their experiences and suggestions from their experiences so we can document them in the draft. JP, do you have any suggestions and insights from the deployment you described in the recent draft? There might be some lessons from that deployment others could learn and I would love to incorporate them in the draft. Here is the link to the current version of the draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-03 - om_p
- [Roll] your comments on rpl implementation and de… Omprakash Gnawali
- Re: [Roll] your comments on rpl implementation an… JP Vasseur (jvasseur)