Re: [Roll] [roll] #97: A fixed value for DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME not OK for all P2P-RPL deployments.

C Chauvenet <c.chauvenet@watteco.com> Thu, 05 April 2012 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <c.chauvenet@watteco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2346721F8718 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 07:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id osy7XLMo6Wvm for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 07:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.205]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6BC21F86F8 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 07:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail89-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.230) by AM1EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.3.204.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:21:45 +0000
Received: from mail89-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail89-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDAEC0231; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:21:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -70
X-BigFish: VPS-70(zzc89bh15caKJzz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839h93fhd25h)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.248.181; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:AMXPRD0510HT001.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received: from mail89-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail89-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1333635703124826_2024; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:21:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.230]) by mail89-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6C934024A; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:21:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AMXPRD0510HT001.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.248.181) by AM1EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (10.3.207.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:21:39 +0000
Received: from AMXPRD0510MB390.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.3.137]) by AMXPRD0510HT001.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.57.36]) with mapi id 14.16.0135.002; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:21:38 +0000
From: C Chauvenet <c.chauvenet@watteco.com>
To: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>, "mukul@UWM.EDU" <mukul@UWM.EDU>, "jpv@cisco.com" <jpv@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] [roll] #97: A fixed value for DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME not OK for all P2P-RPL deployments.
Thread-Index: AQHNEx3w0k66UUklrEm6B1XcZtEnzJaMSGNA
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:21:38 +0000
Message-ID: <97B69B30E0EF244B940B65EA541E3F2D022165D6@AMXPRD0510MB390.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <055.7d6225a737a857a571e335c8e6245a84@trac.tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <055.7d6225a737a857a571e335c8e6245a84@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.3.4.7]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: watteco.com
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #97: A fixed value for DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME not OK for all P2P-RPL deployments.
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:21:48 -0000


-----Message d'origine-----
De : roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de roll issue tracker
Envoyé : jeudi 5 avril 2012 13:03
À : mukul@UWM.EDU; jpv@cisco.com
Cc : roll@ietf.org
Objet : [Roll] [roll] #97: A fixed value for DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME not OK for all P2P-RPL deployments.

#97: A fixed value for DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME not OK for all P2P-RPL deployments.

 Resolution: Make DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME as well as MAX_DRO_RETRANSMISSIONS  configurable parameters.

 Discussion:

 p25 :  o DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME: The time duration a target waits for the DRO-  ACK before retransmitting a DRO message. DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME has a
      value of 1 second.

 [Cedric]
 I'm not sure it is compliant with all RPL deployments.
 Could we adapt it to the characteristics of the network used ?

 [Mukul]
 I am OK with making DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME as well as MAX_DRO_RETRANSMISSIONS  configurable parameters.

[Cedric2]
Safe enough.

-- 
-----------------------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  jpv@…                  |      Owner:  mukul@…
     Type:  defect                 |     Status:  new
 Priority:  major                  |  Milestone:
Component:  applicability-ami      |    Version:
 Severity:  Submitted WG Document  |   Keywords:
-----------------------------------+---------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/97>
roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll