Re: [Roll] Which functions in RPLv2?
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 14 September 2020 14:58 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C443A3A0B0E for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J0fuh_dWY1_p for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF1243A0B0C for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AB63899E for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:37:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id b9Ggc3Vasggn for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:37:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:103c:9eff:fecb:2eac]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47A93899A for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:37:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F1E11A3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:58:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35656D743C23C2884D7ECDFAD8230@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB35656D743C23C2884D7ECDFAD8230@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:58:51 -0400
Message-ID: <30484.1600095531@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/_3guU9yoW3KlpCeCqHI0fACutig>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Which functions in RPLv2?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:58:57 -0000
Rahul> Will now be the right time to check consensus with the WG on what
Rahul> behaviour may have to be mandated as part of RPLv2?
I don't believe that it's yet time to do that.
I think that the path is to design and deploy capabilities.
To my mind, RPLv2 is not a set of knobs that are mandated to be on, but
rather the ability to determine what is available and turn them on.
Sure, we may well write a document that says all of your three points are
mandatory to implement, and turned on by default.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- [Roll] Which functions in RPLv2? Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Which functions in RPLv2? Ines Robles
- Re: [Roll] Which functions in RPLv2? Michael Richardson