From nobody Mon Sep 14 07:58:58 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C443A3A0B0E for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:58:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J0fuh_dWY1_p for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF1243A0B0C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AB63899E for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:37:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id b9Ggc3Vasggn for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:37:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:103c:9eff:fecb:2eac]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47A93899A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:37:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F1E11A3 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:58:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Roll] Which functions in RPLv2? X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:58:57 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rahul> Will now be the right time to check consensus with the WG on what Rahul> behaviour may have to be mandated as part of RPLv2? I don't believe that it's yet time to do that. I think that the path is to design and deploy capabilities. To my mind, RPLv2 is not a set of knobs that are mandated to be on, but rather the ability to determine what is available and turn them on. Sure, we may well write a document that says all of your three points are mandatory to implement, and turned on by default. =2D- Michael Richardson . o O ( IPv6 I=C3=B8T consulti= ng ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAl9fhSsACgkQgItw+93Q 3WVogAf6AmrCFcmEep5ROD85QFoLJ88YSHAD+teyxdbc5R7W15mnBOzEYCU3bPyp Qn/u0PT+lfR+s/rgdWmKB5PaMTIQWMYKOc5NkLtJxDqy/kJmQyQuSnKkg4Zdhyre xJ9VflNgrJcoxMDdN6ad/8lNjvwDf29AtRT8Xy23RlMWuUnDS7eFICFakNfQQ3sL sytk4sTaxcvfgCplTiNZrY2Cggo8edn9GPzcX/OKJkpR1d/nH9K0miDsTlXiZUUD 94+ShHuTwMq9XUeBCvTwtgSTX01gtX76paUZUxcH6uG4a9rdcRwf7KySUkN94SWh k/fO03pXxYC+JQE4ORK5fyx4zTBl3g== =8PTn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--