Re: [Roll] Brian Haberman Discuss on on draft-ietf-roll-minrank-hysteresis-of-10

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 25 May 2012 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77E521F86FF for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2012 08:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.892
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03bmGFhAdUTz for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2012 08:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [67.23.6.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1278921F86EC for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2012 08:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F99A86C4 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2012 11:15:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 161B09823C; Fri, 25 May 2012 11:17:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from marajade.sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150F598239 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2012 11:17:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: roll@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <E0C9B8D6-1947-457C-86D8-A5C3FB74FEC8@gmail.com>
References: <25665.1337180676@marajade.sandelman.ca> <4FB3C7CB.70709@innovationslab.net> <CAErDfUSjWgcgTt2oLDAFO-b4YUdqqfyUnrOC7AukggSCQNLNqQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FBA58CC.9040109@innovationslab.net> <19650.1337713406@marajade.sandelman.ca> <593C2D52-E780-4D75-B535-7F2B147642A0@gmail.com> <23542.1337782756@marajade.sandelman.ca> <B007D59E-A49D-48C0-B8FD-8EA9C10E4D8D@gmail.com> <32356.1337806435@marajade.sandelman.ca> <4FBE8CCB.2050504@innovationslab.net> <E0C9B8D6-1947-457C-86D8-A5C3FB74FEC8@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:17:32 -0400
Message-ID: <17114.1337959052@marajade.sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Roll] Brian Haberman Discuss on on draft-ietf-roll-minrank-hysteresis-of-10
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:17:35 -0000

>>>>> "Ralph" == Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> writes:
    Ralph> OK, do I understand the fundamental issue correctly: the
    Ralph> assumption that there must be some form of installation
    Ralph> process to adapt the device to the specific deployment?

WG: please disagree with this assumption of mine:

    >>> Yes, that's my understanding of what current
    >>> manufacturers/system integrators expect.  Remember: there is
    >>> layer-2 security stuff that also would need to be initialized
    >>> before the smart object could even get on 
    >>> the network to see any kind of announcement.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works 
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/