[Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ?

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Mon, 14 December 2020 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170303A1270 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:08:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=OhphbTuc; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=G6tZ7Yxt
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vc6UTbCXCh1i for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:08:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D7B3A1262 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:08:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5512; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1607958515; x=1609168115; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=4myY3MCdJOVZgHc8KwN34fSkse2TepYMqRPr5PhbxB4=; b=OhphbTucSlNG+BS/mgznCXIHHFkhC1UrZ9yttpnyx+lDMZjuEP9grOoM /9x/yUB2rEcaXLQzUdRW6k/ihxVvLxsVycrIKDnPVjEHG6Afh4OCSrhPv ni/rfqMZ1IQBs6YYMt9HldV5n5xPjlWqk2j0P1S2GtRxaWYzJJZc+mx42 s=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0DwAwC2fddfkJpdJa1igQmBT4EjL1F8Wy8uCod8A55agxaEcYEuFIERA1QLAQEBDQEBLQIEAQGESgKCAQIlNQgOAgMBAQEDAgMBAQEBBQEBAQIBBgQUAQEBAQEBhjgBC4V0BBMbEwEBOAQNAYEAJgEEGxqDBAGBflcDDiABoEwCgTyIaXSBNIMEAQEFhRYYghAJgTiCdYpSG4FBP4FUhxc8g0iCLIMrgmKaY51hCoJ0kwyIXqI8lAOcW4RLAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFXATaBWXAVgyRQFwINjjuDV4pYdDcCBgoBAQMJfIhhAYEQAQE
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:brgccRXBCKk39ZrJOswC8erT/G/V8LGuZFwc94YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSBNyBufNJl+SQtLrvCiQM4peE5XYFdpEEFxoIkt4fkAFoBsmZQVb6I/jnY21ffoxCWVZp8mv9PR1TH8DzNFzfvnP06iQdSV3zMANvLbHzHYjfx828y+G1/cjVZANFzDqwaL9/NlO4twLU48IXmoBlbK02z0jE
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,420,1599523200"; d="scan'208,217";a="614196512"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 14 Dec 2020 15:08:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0BEF8YEj020245 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:08:34 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:08:34 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:08:33 -0500
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:08:32 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Tmfzq6l6mW69kC0pE77i6UXuwHIhObAB3Eb8ieX97h+Gr66YCN+Gd4NQ7Evz23hMkMXi8aFcGhnECVCWsrcgyjIoYaJ8jaHu1w6ksX24ycRkAfwLaqRR08TIy93pnbRXBYq1p2htr4B2F0yIcEnw+CoNIsLWiCCifJZ/tUl2seq7wQ7LYIGdoPUe1jSVcxbRx8yXgSVi532tx15ImD65P8OQ9HJN0GUCU01tSZ380orLmbRUvgpZTDo3R3W0YFkzq+ExD1E7gKZBp4hDXcyhfkEPkGx0rOjh8W0D3y1KLSn4/IvA4XRZL8RNakAe6dV8++8VvK/ktuc6ISPUcTuJOA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EbcUp5btesw2cM3H8q5PSueY/Ns07U6Er3s1peVQD/I=; b=N8I12LHDHhnShhaQ0FzfvTj7YOWwvgJC965A41tN1m75yNfFsynJYQs//0+zQ0OEnZNdrmyitFvaOhhY0YzBbfg0tfvzLyq5EJUVGr7v9SFxGedOpGdUbKtaRvxI3VEl5BYybDU5+p/AQTo67Oe517O+tNh3fxPeqDApfEst8qMQBbvqAMDV76CNJnqHA9/sx415gka89fgxsKZlfyWW7PMAjvw6Chpcbwj9DBx+Gd4wk5m9J4nHM+FRrRiw4KgbZmW3TAoIS7BeeBLTlhKV2RnjAohJXGKra5VrSyIHXXTPh00HrV/zLm9f1Wzvg1iqVXCyyZVqCS4nAMdSZZvhUQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EbcUp5btesw2cM3H8q5PSueY/Ns07U6Er3s1peVQD/I=; b=G6tZ7YxtjuYEeEOuiNqASxf47j7iwyqkDfiJSUgC0Lv0OOvgJwxv01fx5J8poh8QNdFmNewI1bY+EvaYUbw5ejWofQ4lonIcVoKbZdaqhABAhcOUzYkCG8lVvGVMMAId1e12eolEswdngAipRqhWo3mDLKeZGEa0AUiMmzKsusU=
Received: from CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:91::20) by CO1PR11MB4884.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:6c::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.13; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:08:32 +0000
Received: from CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::499:4510:59d6:8f61]) by CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::499:4510:59d6:8f61%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3654.020; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:08:32 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ?
Thread-Index: AdbSKq8XQi5iGTjWROKxBz2KFMD2wg==
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:08:08 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:07:22 +0000
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB48818A537C3EA3FC85E73C0BD8C70@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.56]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bc1461bd-262d-445b-f3cd-08d8a0421efa
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CO1PR11MB4884:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR11MB4884778C3AB596A862D871E1D8C70@CO1PR11MB4884.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:669;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: U+HhacIBTACZj39C9OIVf6eB0c2Nn3BEte8xGXsuPI0o+nRh23ehDpL+H9lSKEvZRpYHc1/B9Uf5SOif7FishQjCwLj7M0s7encX/kKbpKb/uAxlpa69nktKfe1JAGYtVTiVOPZO5c5BoffH+MGXXrWtCry5Cc5VVfbOlqwn9ivxZkIhoXVMTsrfNes2KWlA6ycgqYovwHUs0eaWupC9unrIWLJD0kdO+Q1a2rmpyEhnyhkel9SY+UXeYpQFxUZZGZ67LkZMdR3p1/o2dXEd5ME4bhe2wrrg8nHZJg3E00j5a1SSPBd98UlazjF6AkRPgUfZAkX9zvXc3KLRtpn4zQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(366004)(346002)(376002)(136003)(64756008)(26005)(33656002)(186003)(76116006)(508600001)(83380400001)(6916009)(66476007)(66556008)(6666004)(8936002)(6506007)(9686003)(55016002)(4744005)(66446008)(52536014)(86362001)(5660300002)(2906002)(71200400001)(7696005)(8676002)(66946007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CO1PR11MB48818A537C3EA3FC85E73C0BD8C70CO1PR11MB4881namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bc1461bd-262d-445b-f3cd-08d8a0421efa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Dec 2020 15:08:32.0426 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: kNO3kDvM7W+MCCk3kZTuZ/C9pTVvSF7zvvrhPgXpAlVGFR/m1z7AcwlbInaHXIG4UuL00L7mBPF/6NnrAliT+A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR11MB4884
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.15, xch-aln-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/_ytG47E8M4sOg5bHPlyPIFblGeY>
Subject: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:08:37 -0000

Dear all:

We just got this remark in Elwyn's review of the RUL draft:


> s1, s2.2, s2.3: The term defined in [USEofRPLinfo] is RPL-Unaware-Leaf rather

> than RPL-Unaware Leaf: s/RPL-Unaware Leaf/RPL-Unaware Leaf/ (3 places).

> Similarly s/RPL-Aware Leaf/RPL-Aware-Leaf/ (1 place) and s/RPL-Aware

> Node/RPL-Aware-node/ (2 places).



I wondered, in terms of English which makes more sense?



We can fix either draft. I can't understand why useofrplinfo has a '-' between aware and leaf?



Keep safe;



Pascal