[Roll] [roll] #177 (applicability-ami): Editorial Comments for ami draft - IESG Evaluation-

"roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> Fri, 13 May 2016 11:27 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AB712D165; Fri, 13 May 2016 04:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.896
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T_YrcLrqUYx7; Fri, 13 May 2016 04:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F16A12D108; Fri, 13 May 2016 04:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:40540 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1b1BFZ-0000PN-Pw; Fri, 13 May 2016 04:27:21 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami@ietf.org, mariainesrobles@gmail.com
X-Trac-Project: roll
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:27:21 -0000
X-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/177
Message-ID: <068.18bd6acfbeca2f3d8e7d30f64ac6ed8f@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 177
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami@ietf.org, mariainesrobles@gmail.com, roll@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20160513112722.5F16A12D108@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 04:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/a04dujFHgmOkV9Y2L3070rMXJ0k>
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] [roll] #177 (applicability-ami): Editorial Comments for ami draft - IESG Evaluation-
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: roll@ietf.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:27:24 -0000

#177: Editorial Comments for ami draft - IESG Evaluation-

 Comments by Suresh Krishnan (Comment (2016-05-03))


 Section 1.2: Required reading - Why is the item [surveySG] in required
 reading not part of the normative references?

 Section 1.3: Please expand RPL before first use and add a reference to

 Section 2: Is this section really required? Seems like a summarization of
 the RPL RFC. At least consider removing the part that starts with  "RPL
 was designed to meet the following application requirements:" and mentions
 a list of requirement RFCs. This list does not seem relevant here and is
 also covered in the RPL spec itself.

 Section 4.1: This does not sound right. Isn't the periodic meter read
 traffic going the other direction? " The traffic generated by the head-end
 server and destined to metering devices is dominated by periodic meter

 Section 7.4.1: Please add a reference the trickle algorithm at first use.
 e.g. "Trickle [RFC6206] was designed to be..."

 Reporter:                           |      Owner:  draft-ietf-roll-
  mariainesrobles@gmail.com          |  applicability-ami@ietf.org
     Type:  defect                   |     Status:  new
 Priority:  major                    |  Milestone:
Component:  applicability-ami        |    Version:
 Severity:  In WG Last Call          |   Keywords:

Ticket URL: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/177>
roll <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>