Re: [Roll] [6lo] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1505E1A87E3; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uZo-Lw_ci-Xj; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B3AC1A87E1; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1894; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1409084337; x=1410293937; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=gShpDtW+2BWsJIdJ2Xn2dMstXfHQKA/nzEok5ixEgT0=; b=fo+5xdJzrKs2Gll+PTr1v2t0epzOwROew966LJKBF69E9iN/44OIXmM2 XfpNK4m4rW4vz56IrVReYFqirkxFD1A8KNTalkxVIa/RBLqbyXAj23Si0 RUKvpOclmWZGnDlwCRpzct2cIbFsUraJIm66/0lPt1t3+UpYrvh7pc7R/ Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AigFAM7q/FOtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABbgw1TV8xTCodMAYEXFneEAwEBAQMBAQEBawsQAgEIFQEwJwslAgQOBYg6CA2/QhMEjxkzB4MvgR0FimyGQYsnlRSDXmyCTwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,406,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="350454121"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2014 20:18:57 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7QKIuoa026066 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:18:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.236]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:18:56 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Richard Kelsey <Richard.Kelsey@silabs.com>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] [Roll] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03
Thread-Index: AQHPwWjiidypJfPYN0WvEDAQ9LxuP5vjUxoi
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:18:55 +0000
Message-ID: <93C4A100-0DEB-4C3F-99CA-D68298DA5F53@cisco.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D503B7@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <53F8057C.9080904@gmail.com>, <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D58843@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>, <8ed59484d41d44649bcc5e1150a1daef@BLUPR07MB611.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <8ed59484d41d44649bcc5e1150a1daef@BLUPR07MB611.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/aD1rH10KRbHaQlWnIMgpWos3jFc
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, "6lo@ietf.org WG" <6lo@ietf.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6lo] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:18:59 -0000

Richard:

Maybe you should read the draft.

I removed all references to my proposal of how to use the Flow label for RPL.

What the 6MAN draft is now asking is only the right to manipulate a flow label in the LLN, RPL or not RPL, be it only to reset it to zero so as to elide it.

The Idea to propose a 6lowpan compression is actually from Laurent and I was the first on the ML to support it.

Cheers,
Pascal

Le 26 août 2014 à 22:04, "Richard Kelsey" <Richard.Kelsey@silabs.com> a écrit :

>> From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) [pthubert@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 12:30 PM
>> 
>> I understand, Brian:
>> 
>> It makes sense to propose a generic rule and try it on the real
>> world. But it is not surprising that such a bold approach fails to
>> be universal when confronted to the real world.  To be very clear on
>> the need for 6MAN to take our responsibilities, I added text to
>> clarify that 6437 as of today is dramatically counterproductive for
>> the development of IPv6 in LLNs.
> 
> Pascal,
> 
> Hold on a second.  First of all, not everyone doing IPv6 in LLNs
> is using RPL.  Second of all, not everyone using RPL in LLNs is
> particularly hindered by the overhead of using RFC 6553.  And finally,
> Carsten's suggested 6lo encoding of the RPL Option arguably has
> better properties than using the flow label and is definitely not
> "dramatically" worse.
> 
> Personally, I think using the flow label in this way is a very bad
> idea.  The games that are played within an LLN to make IPv6 work there
> need to be invisible to the rest of the Internet.  Universal rules
> are what its all about.
> 
>                               -Richard Kelsey
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo