[Roll] "Node energy" as a metric for MRHOF
Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 01 June 2012 19:53 UTC
Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62FC21F87AB for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hL8kSd9-AF2B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D82821F87A8 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so1693731vbb.31 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=4qIjhY6y0PhEukQfijRr3nQwEn0vQXgB+siFHOmamT8=; b=NGS8ldljfgW7Ew0FpEe9xkndvZ3fbcYs8j3N4Z1sXyFC2Tzx+esshK57GqlP6ckN8J LX9s6B+837xYiDPqaPRiELLtP8VUy1HemRfAiSiVhrK8llQj47gyfmwEauUbE/R+1+zb VgYHemtoYegSYADce0+6K3I6GitEFKuzkA93cDaTC7puIdZXZOlxtlHCdMgOWc7spGwS B1YsOsi5b5B9A8CzIEbh27Yz19FGeKWaE9FwD1Zd2jvFoUTTU6cP1tvoMRt9TrCL8XtC cW9Ac/445k28i7uzuLB7RCNLvPN/sM2aGOMKE0ZB03DVuI8M2qHRxf3jiHq1pajOEJBg OaiA==
Received: by 10.220.215.136 with SMTP id he8mr3880699vcb.13.1338580397618; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che-vpn-cluster-1-318.cisco.com (198-135-0-233.cisco.com. [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n2sm4544715vdj.3.2012.06.01.12.53.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:53:14 -0400
Message-Id: <943C0516-F78E-43FD-AECD-F66A8B930F21@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-roll-minrank-hysteresis-of@tools.ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] "Node energy" as a metric for MRHOF
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:53:19 -0000
I came across a new puzzle while re-reading draft-ietf-roll-minrank-hysteresis-of. "Node energy" doesn't appear to be listed as an additive metric in RFC 6551. Reading the description of the node energy metric, which carries remaining battery capacity as a percentage of initial capacity, I have no clue how a node using MRHOF would compute a path cost based on node energy. Does node energy really fit as one of the metrics that MRHOF can use? - Ralph
- [Roll] "Node energy" as a metric for MRHOF Ralph Droms
- Re: [Roll] "Node energy" as a metric for MRHOF Omprakash Gnawali
- Re: [Roll] "Node energy" as a metric for MRHOF JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] "Node energy" as a metric for MRHOF Ralph Droms