[Roll] [roll] #174 (routing-dispatch): consider changing RPI HbH header value from 63 to 43.
"roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> Tue, 29 March 2016 17:25 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162E312DAB4; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xuo_D5XfF8q5; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13C7212D9DE; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:38459 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1akxCd-00079P-3F; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:13:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: roll issue tracker <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch@ietf.org, mcr@sandelman.ca
X-Trac-Project: roll
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:13:15 -0000
X-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/174
Message-ID: <059.5f61f282832905780b2b22e860e9d7b9@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 174
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch@ietf.org, mcr@sandelman.ca, roll@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20160329171319.13C7212D9DE@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:13:15 -0700
Resent-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/aXGPlzVlmiCeyJ_9GGPPwFS_lLQ>
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] [roll] #174 (routing-dispatch): consider changing RPI HbH header value from 63 to 43.
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: roll@ietf.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:25:00 -0000
#174: consider changing RPI HbH header value from 63 to 43. 6man considers obsoleting HbH processing in routers, which would result in either all packets containing HbH headers being dropped by the Internet at large, or all HbH headers being ignored, regardless of their value. What hosts will do with HbH is unknown in this process, but we know at least that changing the value to 43 would permit existing hosts to accept the RPI header as is. This change would be deployed along with the routing-dispatch compression, and it may result in some cases not requiring an additional IPIP header. (In particular, the storing case for traffic within the LLN, with non-RPL aware leaf nodes would be able to use only the RPI header, and it could be inserted at the originator of the packet, assuming it is RPL aware) While there are still many cases that would require an IPIP header to be inserted, I still think that this change is worthwhile. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-roll-routing- mcr@sandelman.ca | dispatch@ietf.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: routing- | Version: dispatch | Keywords: Severity: Active WG | Document | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/174> roll <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>
- [Roll] [roll] #174 (routing-dispatch): consider c… roll issue tracker