IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Sun, 26 August 2018 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41D2130DDC for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PvpQEQ3BRK5Z for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0ADB130DD3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id e12-v6so11038611iok.12 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hiqOvEQ+Hhj7eoqUgKoubDlAdVsLpfJ0kNxAWotpurA=; b=ceZwA9EaltZNcDXqOwfcKws7nwRO6eBjAeZNv45Nvrm5Ho/g+3YI7VOjt7VbiSDwAm ArJB646zkmPlBJYkMxPyD+pMKJ5nK7I7J8DG3A2bgO9OrXB9jyh3htjih7x49fadAp+M bF4GDsBjV5SMEJahkyQd2/tQDYfaJS4PMzbd+kQcffGiF38SybHo0DV7hd4O4rGvDPz0 OS/x5HhoDox1egUe1TsTr2F6ikhbVXdYFxRDMUPJmcMNnmA5pZRDlWosaoG8yZuMYTUy 3ucNSs2oLefmAcE7qydaBSF6RpAF3r+iplrQghk7PoQeRan02BBeMXG2v4JBjnGcgtqK kGsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=hiqOvEQ+Hhj7eoqUgKoubDlAdVsLpfJ0kNxAWotpurA=; b=anka4TewPwuyjLz7pR/6rqL123AZanePCc5wQY6LbS37YVPwXAoWYRb5wwHbjM3Elz j25aDMinH8BJyj24RAVLD2WHKJSyPyG9YJcfvzDnXFEn70DNcHSTaFhS/o+psvGGq1Ck ZJ5H9jycSKxiAWZaibVpBBOGIyM39EEgsgBRd8BrCgiA1va+Aj/YR0eWvWKccpezD78I NwVOAfeXfGGyRifTuF+yvdMpkQmMt2rlnvWi2AYKtGohqTohTljOMLppEJIlcKVxizqP zEuUWZI8LieG3Yf56U1RyrFrvQvqvCMJHFpJ89CRHwi8nR8tcqzRfxmgw1TRCWQ1A3B0 cidA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51D88qjsX0jZrHKCRc3t/Q1fX03jZr7xSXf109Atcv2tDmA/O9sF yAStTcDS3pgY3e4HefSL7+69OZBrtEqAXyoitlTTWA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdany6bjQAgYRq2o+vfFOiDyOAyR5dqpPh0vaTvPAjNu/E9LltIgo29UYo7mi5G5YNUtBM4tvmI1hN7yQfBKtOI=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:2353:: with SMTP id j80-v6mr7265798ioj.99.1535307690887; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:a752:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAO0Djp2VFLAnD=MKPeaASZ587LRS+apbQLP+oJZG6u1PsMq+Bw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUdnS2Stv+-YsqvOrdc=s1jc_0E+UWKU=ErD1w+n9QaQOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO0Djp2VFLAnD=MKPeaASZ587LRS+apbQLP+oJZG6u1PsMq+Bw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 21:21:30 +0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUfh4bWp8q=ZSQc8hh8s5vs5Ur07CoRF=vV6Mm3uWGFPfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000894f3905745aad22"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/bBQbz35Omx4jhFBoOBThT5LKM1Q>
Subject: Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:21:34 -0000

Excellent, Thank you very much Rahul.

Ines.

2018-08-24 20:18 GMT+03:00 Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>:

> Hello All,
>
> For efficient NPDAO we have updated the text based on Remy's comments.
> Thank you Remy.
>
> For RPL-Observations, we have added a section which describes Motivation
> for this draft and clearly mentions that the draft is not intended for RFC
> track but as WG discussion track.
>
> Regards,
> Rahul
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 15:18, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.
> com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your reviews on the required drafts.
>>
>> So far we have:
>>
>> - For WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-03:  to add corrections
>> by this thread: https://www..ietf..org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/
>> msg10568.html
>> <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10568.html>
>>
>> - For for draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-04: to add corrections by this thread:
>> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10570.html
>>
>> - WG Call for adoption: RPL-Observations. => Adopt this document.
>> Could the authors please submit a new ietf draft with some text in the
>> introduction explaining that this is a WG informational document, that is
>> not intended for RFC track but as WG discussion track. Parts of the
>> document may be used in other future RFCs.
>>
>> We have created new tickets to address the concerns discussed in IETF 101
>> [https://trac.ietf.org/trac/roll/report/2]
>>
>> #179 Security considerations for dao projection
>> #180 13 issues to address in dao projection draft (lifetime, MOP,
>> retransmissions, route cleanup)
>> #186 Useofrplinfo - AD review
>> #187 New version of RFC6550 - Topics to include
>> #188 Should 6LBR be included into the DODAG root?
>> #189 RPL and new MOP?
>>
>> Are #189 and #187 strongly related in anybody's view?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ines and Peter
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email