Re: [Roll] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-08

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Mon, 23 March 2015 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 8C5621A8BC2; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 07:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706F81A8BC1 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 07:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jKGiKjFF0eys for <xfilter-draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E83B1A8BBF for <draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.25]:54661) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <stokcons@xs4all.nl>) id 1Ya3fo-0002I4-VG for draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@tools.ietf.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:49:50 +0100
Received: from roundcube.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.209]) by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP id 72p41q00J4WfiVN012p4it; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:49:08 +0100
Received: from [2001:67c:370:160:d513:7d2a:a738:f71] by roundcube.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:49:04 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:49:04 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A3316DED6@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A3316DED6@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Message-ID: <f25dbb550ac1a0d6ad1ad8823974c364@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (cO8FBEHntcgf2jGfjt0ZVNhSgVSrT31p)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 194.109.24.25
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stokcons@xs4all.nl
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150323144952.2E83B1A8BBF@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 07:49:52 -0700
Resent-From: stokcons@xs4all.nl
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@tools/nSB7v2LoRPdH8o3S-F2F-foleNM>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/bbzZM2lWj8dqf7CtLM-U5JBz8ok>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:00:31 -0700
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-08
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:49:53 -0000

HI Meral,

Thanks for the suggestions.
I have no problem with any of them. I think they are quite justified. 
Thank you very much for pointing them out.
Concerning scene and group control. I may suppress the word "scene".
About [occuswitch] I have to look for a valid alternative. However, 
these links are maintained by a company, which changes information 
frequently.
Sorry for missing out some of the acronyms. I thought I caught them out 
all.

Greetings,

Peter


Meral Shirazipour schreef op 2015-03-22 21:28:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-08
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review Date: 2015-03-21
> IETF LC End Date:  2015-03-23
> IESG Telechat date: NA
> 
> 
> Summary:
> This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have
> some comments.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> -[Page 1], "RPL" first used in title/abstract, Would be good to spell 
> it out.
> -[Page 5], Section 2, "Monitoring of functional correctness is at
> least as important.". As important as what? (not clear)
> -[Page 5], Section 2, "Devices typically communicate their status
> regularly and send alarm messages notifying a malfunction of equipment
> or network."
> Not clear what equipment is? network node is an equipment?
> -[Page 6], Section 2.1, "for large installation"--->"for a large 
> installation"
> -[Page 8], Section 2.2.2, "fire detectors and the smoke dampers need
> to be put in place to meet the stringent delay requirements."
> Where can we find a value for the delay requirement of fire detectors?
> A value or reference would be good.
> -[Page 9], Section 2.2.4,"advanced scene and group control". Not clear
> what "scene" means.
> -[Page 13], Section 4.1, "assumes the role as
> authoritative"--->"assumes the role of authoritative"
> -[Page 16], section 4.1.8, please spell out first use CBC-MAC (Cipher
> Block Chaining Message Authentication Code)
> -[Page 16], section 4.1.10, it would be good to give the RFCs.
> -[Page 16], section 4.2.4, MLE to spell out at first use "mesh link
> establishment"
> -[Page 22], "CoAp" first used in section 7.4, but spelled out in 
> section 8.
> -[Page 18], section 5.1.1., "to throw away too late messages", how are
> too late messages identified?
> -[Page 27], [I-D.ietf-6lo-lowpanz] to be replaced by RFC7428
> -[Page 28], link to [occuswitch] to be verified.
> -Through the document both "ms" and "msec" are used. Selecting one for
> consistency would be better.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Meral
> ---
> Meral Shirazipour
> Ericsson
> Research
> www.ericsson.com