Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-33.txt

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 23 December 2019 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFD4120887; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:59:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGO1Ctdt8Xbo; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:59:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2F7212087E; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id f8so15714415edv.2; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:59:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fFDyUMfT1Mrav6SuCw88I9zPUVBcBysykPFDkHCH+n0=; b=e8KVeExB15sQd8rSpHYLLfc0x4rslhl/R1yc/j1Ye8d86556w3/bHcZnN+DZdIUIOr c1wFP9vnm+nAqqEC3pNXgYoNK6czUBxSE0KSXlm0oXrTKyV2gXSQ10QAyl4SBmCc9yfv q0ZBFl4PL7GnLx01Z5fQUCZ3HWcm/2mdk1CaNwWm37Mb9uPWqAn8GpSj9i6VauoJ18nO Qt+tneACbU37ymAaWFuelfsY/5mwmGBLn2CY9os5VgLnCsHqiwDzOxNHDvEfiEWWTWtk DCxb7Gz19ZJBEzSTx87Yved0Q/k8Om9peTJSJ1amgBwSQnbTo6mQ6ohlYReEapVCv4NV 2AyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fFDyUMfT1Mrav6SuCw88I9zPUVBcBysykPFDkHCH+n0=; b=fb4DecV/qeSjwlW6x4E4YQipihDMPgFEyFox0VOojnzUVn6NrbY24plR3M1EusIWI0 SD/7IyRYmfj2iFF+DljC9q3TgqLzALtpfskjQE+Mcyc2ccJP7XoCYlmHnnkmhs7lZaLO nDhpDgodhaYBsA7v+fSCYsXg95Qo0csy6DnQo48VdPDcmdRGhmlhWYRfXMgm3RotR2Fj Q+d1x4aDVOCiolnxAwyNw8lHVXkVTuv275LqDVYFcU2Ez3iZFytq+R69HsV2/vNzJCwZ zLaQdVLhAKtwc050nwtLMmj4y9ZBTecx+ACcbn1sE/dssiZ+cAzAC8X7H2gs/f79QTC6 HwlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWXAoL25vPIDwwNm1aLxZ0O6O0dmaR3kDRGsQQvTMabqnYKI0ay R7UJ2y7ZhKmPCWbkk5lozsbXG3kyM5J3z+p6zu8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzNdofjiI3RoAcu8Nl7cmNoC5UBfQs1sYKCd1dp0P+BdyJ8lsJJXPSQz5gcb7xY5Ugc8OyPfn5WMZZUxat6WHc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:71a:: with SMTP id y26mr33280024ejb.48.1577116761400; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:59:20 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54544EAB-3E9D-4AC4-AF12-34744107113F@cisco.com>
References: <157625292446.13032.11161704505016203216@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESsy4mcnvGXGc9Q_rK7bKuO_Fcu1qOgdQ+upfbAPqKt1_Ag@mail.gmail.com> <54544EAB-3E9D-4AC4-AF12-34744107113F@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:59:20 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESsytAPTkbuHa_X81_ar4EQgGdoEesPEx9mxmYUa=bKao5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>, "roll-chairs@ietf.org" <roll-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo@ietf.org>, Peter van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/bmCWSaMb1O2lLY89VwbEfLP03cQ>
Subject: Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-33.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 15:59:26 -0000

On December 19, 2019 at 4:14:52 PM, Pascal Thubert wrote:

Pascal:

Hi!

> Per RFC 8200, an IPv6 host the has no specific code for rfc 6550 should still
> process a packet with RPL artifacts since the RH is consumed and a host
> ignores the HbH headers.

Yes, of course.  That is also in fact what you wrote in the text.

It is now clear to me -- no further changes needed for that part. :-)

Thanks!

Alvaro.