[Roll] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-04.txt

Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu> Tue, 11 September 2012 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFD521F8713 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7AzRfrLTwju for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [129.7.240.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E0821F8624 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A7623CA8B for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:36:33 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.uh.edu
Received: from dijkstra.cs.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HjmmvvIa1xpQ for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:36:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from it.cs.uh.edu (www2.cs.uh.edu [129.7.240.6]) by dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F1F23CA8A for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:36:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by it.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C45D2A280C3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:41:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14so1378054vcb.31 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.21.82 with SMTP id t18mr21868290vde.66.1347395797067; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.198.41 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120911092619.17893.9225.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120911092619.17893.9225.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:36:16 -0500
Message-ID: <CAErDfUQiCN=CQN_eYOirtZhQVX9mFX-ha4_4V=kwLpGSFjSHLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [Roll] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-04.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:36:45 -0000

I added this text to the draft:


11.  Prevent Situations That Make Nodes Leaf

   When different nodes in a single network run different OFs, have
   incompatible metrics, or run a mix of storing and non-storing
   modes[I-D.ko-roll-mix-network-pathology], the nodes may not join the
   DODAG or join as leaf nodes which do not extend DODAG connectivity as
   described in Section 8.5 of [RFC6550].  Thus, operating as a leaf
   node in the middle of a network can lead to network partitioning even
   though the network is physically connected.  Generally avoid
   configurations that force some nodes to operate as leaf nodes even
   though the leaf nodes are at the physical edge of the network.


Comments welcome.

- om_p

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:  <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:26 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-04.txt
To: gnawali@cs.uh.edu
Cc: pal@cs.stanford.edu



A new version of I-D, draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-04.txt
has been successfully submitted by Omprakash Gnawali and posted to the
IETF repository.

Filename:        draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations
Revision:        04
Title:           Recommendations for Efficient Implementation of RPL
Creation date:   2012-09-11
WG ID:           Individual Submission
Number of pages: 7
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-04.txt
Status:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations
Htmlized:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-04
Diff:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-04

Abstract:
   RPL is a flexible routing protocol applicable to a wide range of Low
   Power and Lossy Networks.  To enable this wide applicability, RPL
   provides many configuration options and gives implementers choices on
   how to implement various components of RPL.  Drawing on our
   experiences, we distill the design choices and configuration
   parameters that lead to efficient RPL implementations and operations.




The IETF Secretariat