Re: [Roll] Proposed changes to roll-enrollment-priority to reflect major points of our discussion (PR #14)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 10 February 2022 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA1A3A105F for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:59:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oe6EvuYqCOTS for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F3BB3A1083 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:59:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F144538A06 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:06:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id H3Emop2_yY8Q for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:06:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BE9389FA for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:06:52 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1644523612; bh=r4SG4XR4QZi8oiv8Je59yZ9cM0UKiKyh6aI5InkvMOY=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Yg7DBdCpVHQM9YC6GZ3Lmetc6gDjayuwkUZDuTDGDUQjuscCz1Kl+q+YO9H7YJNdz vJEn6MxpLtmstEKwDiQHSrg5d9EpJjXLfuqakwMJMP+HvK1m6vi9gK2MrGSibzVfbG z7HJ63eiHMOpO1OdhjOMW/SLgMMHu9Z9BRZT64Yw+xCl4Z5sjO3I5X1T5kntDe1vRl uApXWPJ0jJikDM9SzCVnWkTSbnzgGvUx3VzNzCE6cs/fhMXuEtzgAcrsC4p0//UL5/ ZnrjSqc0gKZLZbpGTQ7CeGkBZllbleUOlr/ZGF2Qbhhz2rHrlc3kkK4jxmu3OEXs07 gKDSnWhUxhWTg==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76A7A0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:59:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <19341.1644512146@localhost>
References: <roll-wg/draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority/pull/14@github.com> <roll-wg/draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority/pull/14/c1032184406@github.com> <CADPqcJ+nODjV5C9xdtT=POh=jXvmGz2WYEwXAimF9kJjnk27CA@mail.gmail.com> <19341.1644512146@localhost>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:59:06 -0500
Message-ID: <1499.1644523146@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/cgxXzswqDCZ4Vi1VSjQkUnUrwHg>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Proposed changes to roll-enrollment-priority to reflect major points of our discussion (PR #14)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:59:17 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:

    > I want to alert the list fo the discussion that is occuring at:
    > https://github.com/roll-wg/draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority/pull/14

To simplify what text is being discussed, I've accepted all of Konrad's
editorial comments into the main github branch.

At this point, I wonder if we shouldn't have two options:

> 1. propagating base priority settings in the DODAG,
> 2. advertising the actual priorities of individual nodes.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide