Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Sat, 14 April 2012 09:53 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6FD21F8618 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 02:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.178
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.178 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.421, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MNCmaWWagrne for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 02:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F145221F84B2 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 02:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=pthubert@cisco.com; l=2911; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1334397218; x=1335606818; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=ekH0+MXMakR3y/YaybVe+sF3CnYMLHBjhlbxxbFq96I=; b=LRkO6Q/Y35cmPzlGLELePQnxS61g0aqZkKC5qLmwW5rJNlv+br539EnF vugdSxCNcnirb7vE0lZlvMTQ5mjE6CO9tpkdXFg1viJagpo3QAfMbVLTW fTByNqG/efSAnH4xBvuJor+X4I3//rot87i09J1GNti5jaZRoUa3OALOP s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAJ9IiU+Q/khL/2dsb2JhbABEDrUIgQeCCQEBAQQBAQEPAR0KNAsMBAIBCBEEAQELBhcBBgEbCx8JCAEBBAESCBEBCIdsC54zkVSGLZBmYwSHCo90iw+CLIFpgjA5
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,422,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="70849027"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2012 09:53:36 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-101.cisco.com (xbh-ams-101.cisco.com [144.254.74.71]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3E9rawI022778; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:53:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-108.cisco.com ([144.254.74.83]) by xbh-ams-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:53:36 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:52:33 +0200
Message-ID: <BDF2740C082F6942820D95BAEB9E1A84016A8F31@XMB-AMS-108.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <954135049.21268.1334343592521.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update
Thread-Index: Ac0Zp5/JTQOLl9S0Se6B1CUwsfpCHQAe84GQ
References: <22563.1334342114@marajade.sandelman.ca> <954135049.21268.1334343592521.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Apr 2012 09:53:36.0703 (UTC) FILETIME=[762714F0:01CD1A24]
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:53:39 -0000

Hi:

For the changes I suggested, I certainly agree with Mukul. 

Those changes provide crisper definitions and clearer limitations, but
mostly should not impact an existing implementation - unless an
implementation already used the upper layer data delivery in which case
a few lines of code might need to be changed. 

Like others I wish to review the final text, in particular for the
things related to upper layer protocols. But the routing piece which is
core appeared sound already in the WLC version of the doc.

Cheers,

Pascal


-----Original Message-----
From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Mukul Goyal
Sent: vendredi 13 avril 2012 21:00
To: Michael Richardson
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update

>You aren't the only one who wants to read all the changes again.

I just wanted to mention that the changes are not that many or
substantial in spite of the mailing list traffic we managed to generate.
Most changes are basically textual clarifications.

Thanks
Mukul 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Thomas Heide Clausen" <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:35:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update


>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> writes:
    Thomas> I've been trying to follow the many mails exchanged as a
    Thomas> consequence of the WGLC of RPL-P2P. 

Yes, using a good threaded reader is a good idea.
The IETF lists are also
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.protocols.rpl
and you can access it via
nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.protocols.rpl
with a usenet newsreader.

    Thomas> Given the volume of changes to the document, I would like to
    Thomas> ask that - once the authors estimate that a version of the
    Thomas> I-D folding in all proposed changes is ready - the WG be
    Thomas> given another 1-2 weeks WGLC before bouncing it off to the
    Thomas> ADs? 

I think that we will do this.
Once a new draft is complete, I will remind the list with a link to the
datatracker ID diff tool.

You aren't the only one who wants to read all the changes again.

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |
firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net
architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device
driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll