Re: [Roll] mixture of storing and non-storing nodes

Philip Levis <pal@cs.stanford.edu> Mon, 03 September 2012 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <pal@cs.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F1421F8598 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fDlMSU6iuw77 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs-smtp-1.Stanford.EDU (cs-smtp-1.Stanford.EDU [171.64.64.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B87021F84A1 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [76.14.66.110] (helo=[192.168.0.103]) by cs-smtp-1.Stanford.EDU with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <pal@cs.stanford.edu>) id 1T8eJx-0006yE-8Z; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:36:37 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Philip Levis <pal@cs.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <952CC507-2BA2-4005-B44A-0E40308E15AF@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:36:37 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1EEC52C7-5B67-459D-A579-D809F5426BD0@cs.stanford.edu>
References: <CAErDfUQV2E5H66k9YjRSGF8RmA=xhQzrDwpyTRBJ8WQUZh3diw@mail.gmail.com> <B7828579-4864-4CBA-A999-808F394D543F@cisco.com> <BD04C41F-0368-4AEB-8E23-EA3043298599@etri.re.kr> <952CC507-2BA2-4005-B44A-0E40308E15AF@cisco.com>
To: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Scan-Signature: 58355bea2820b4cf9b9c8322cdf0b49d
Cc: JeongGil Ko <jeonggil.ko@etri.re.kr>, roll WG <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] mixture of storing and non-storing nodes
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:36:44 -0000

On Aug 23, 2012, at 10:06 PM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote:

>  Thanks for your feed-back, great discussion. If we have sufficient requirements for such a case (let's see what the WG says)

It seems like so far no one has presented a strong case; I'd argue that we should table it until it's needed. RPL is complicated enough already.

Phil