[Roll] RPL implementation

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Tue, 20 January 2015 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3381B2AB3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:32:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spl33k9OBL0z for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:32:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80B61B29DD for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:32:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3438; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1421771535; x=1422981135; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=u491lCRcJYDaGL0IItzPZe1+rSjBAyHYAjPPQ8VIuJY=; b=ccxvzBK9y2pFL8GmC2tz5j/4/LH1Nq7eU3HLQrwwUlBCekqAFNpjxpjD 8V3gyED5wE32noirDtzcnWRvIrKB1Oeb+ElkUqEX899Ba4BIoEbq2BfYW jFGPYUAgwl81cT0aw66Le7se3VXhIRxbejj6Ds2bUcYJHG0ZMfNzttJty 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiwFAOOBvlStJA2E/2dsb2JhbABbgkNDUlzEDYgWAoEkQwEBAQEBfYQOAQQtXgEMHlYmAQQbiCStHqMrAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBHI9Ig06BEwWOWZtBIoNugjR+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,435,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217";a="385585998"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2015 16:32:14 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0KGWDHC016998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:32:14 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.100]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:32:13 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RPL implementation
Thread-Index: AdA0zpRTrxywcNHnQKKo/KHgU7rU9Q==
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:32:12 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:32:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848B2BCA4@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.148.11.115]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848B2BCA4xmbrcdx01ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/dO9GayAMbIRpAZF17NLwySdpqDg>
Subject: [Roll] RPL implementation
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:32:16 -0000

Dear all :

I'm curious about the progress of the protocol inside and outside LLN domains.
Do we have a status on current RPL implementations overall?
In particular, do we have opensource outside pure LLN devices, e.g. a generic linux implementation to play with?

Cheers,

Pascal