Re: [Roll] last call for roll charter text.

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Fri, 16 September 2016 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163F812B28F for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NK9AgKyrlwaa for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1F9412B161 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4884; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1474037828; x=1475247428; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ta8BCj+0xatF4HSiv5iRCGLANL2+wyXXhVzpTDY+1PY=; b=RHFcHcE+Znl6Acvxw3V5ZaPssaperfBP89iZ07QHbHxqgC7zyc+g4pgA yfgpKWLZD0AscGfww0j7f/9o5OBFpmXfnlMopZaI6B9KDP7MHk3w6+oQk jk65Bw286nux9w0EKMVEE1hP7ivzpN52AxuNtPZgO61ccZetBuTGofFor w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0A3AQD3B9xX/5BdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgzoBAQEBAR5XfAeNLKstggMZC4V6AoFUOBQBAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4R?= =?us-ascii?q?hAQEBBAEBARodDyUXBAIBCBEEAQEfCQcnCxQJCAIEARIIE4gvDsBhAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIY2hFSEIAqFdgWZbQGPU4F1hGOJF4xhg3oBHjaEanI?= =?us-ascii?q?BhSGBL38BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,345,1470700800"; d="scan'208";a="147602523"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2016 14:57:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8GEv62B015229 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:57:07 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:57:05 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:57:05 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "consultancy@vanderstok.org" <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, "Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks" <roll@ietf.org>, emarobl <maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] last call for roll charter text.
Thread-Index: AQHSEB4ktJnDPx/U2E66J28DPoFPdaB8NC3A
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:56:40 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:55:55 +0000
Message-ID: <3a2634a9776e421cb337e73c39e63753@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <86972780d65c4f893678ee6963d89b7a@xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <86972780d65c4f893678ee6963d89b7a@xs4all.nl>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.98.183]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/e0Q9LLAbxEHsGqvnoU5I1c_Gg_I>
Subject: Re: [Roll] last call for roll charter text.
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:57:10 -0000

Dear chairs:

I support this charter;

Pascal

-----Original Message-----
From: Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of peter van der Stok
Sent: vendredi 16 septembre 2016 15:24
To: Roll <roll@ietf.org>;; emarobl <maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com>;; Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com>;
Subject: [Roll] last call for roll charter text.

Dear all,

Below the text for the ROLL charter as discussed in Berlin and on the mailing list.
The last additions are the milestones based on the feedback of the past months.

Many thanks for all your contributions. The text is shorter and clearer in my opinion.

Please react to (approve) the text, and review the milestone dates when they concern your work.

End of call: Saturday October 1.

Many thanks,

Peter + Ines

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Charter for ROLL Working Group

Low power and Lossy Networks (LLNs ) are made up of many embedded devices with limited power, memory, and processing resources. They are interconnected by a variety of links, such as IEEE 802.15.4, Bluetooth, Low Power WiFi, wired or other low power PLC (Powerline Communication) links. LLNs are transitioning to an end-to-end IP-based solution to avoid the problem of non-interoperable networks interconnected by protocol translation gateways and proxies.

RFC7102 discusses ROLL specific aspects of LLNs, and RFC7228 provides additional terminology for constrained devices.

RFC 5548, 5673, 5826, and 5876 describe the requirements for LLNs from several application perspectives.
The Working Group has focused on routing solutions for the areas: 
connected home, building, and urban sensor networks. It has developed a Framework that takes into consideration various aspects including high reliability in the presence of time varying loss characteristics and connectivity while permitting low-power operation with very modest memory and CPU pressure in networks potentially comprising a very large number (several thousands) of nodes.

The Working Group continues to focus on routing issues for LLN and to maintain, improve and streamline the protocols developed by the working group, including RPL and MPL.

ROLL will coordinate closely with the working groups in other areas that focus on constrained networks and/or constrained nodes, such as 6lo
(Int) and lwig (Int) and CoRE (App). The working groups PiM (rtg), BIER
(rtg) and MANET (rtg) will be consulted when ROLL work can profit from their results. The Working group will align with the 6man (Int) WG when needed.

Work Items are:

- Guidance in using RFC6553, RFC6554, and IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation. 
The WGLC on this work will be shared with 6lo.

- Compression of  RFC6553, RFC6554, and IP headers in the 6LoWPAN adaptation layer context. (coordinated with 6lo WG).

- Additional protocol elements to reduce packet size and the amount of required routing states

- Automatic selection of MPL forwarders to reduce message replication. 
(coordinated with PiM wg)

- Data models for RPL and MPL management (coordinated with netmod and PiM wg)

- Alternative Multicast algorithm see for example Bier forwarding. 
(coordinated with PiM wg and relateds wg, e.g. BIER)

- Methods to improve or correct the current RPL behavior and the other protocols defined by the working group.

- Alternative Routing mechanism for constrained environments see for example AODV-RPL


Milestones

DATE                            Milestone
September 2018            Recharter WG or close
July 2018 	Initial submission of a solution for 
draft-jadhav-roll-no-path-dao-ps to IESG
November 2017 	Initial submission of draft-satish-roll-aodv-rpl to IESG
November 2017 	Initial submission of 
draft-gundogan-roll-dis-modifications to IESG
July 2017	 Initial submission of draft-bergmann-bier-ccast to IESG
July 2017         Initial submission of 
draft-vanderstok-roll-mpl-forw-select to IESG
March 2017 	Initial submission of draft-vanderstok-roll-mpl-yang to IESG
March 2017 	Initial submission of draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection to 
IESG
November 2016        	  Initial Submission of the draft about when to 
use RFC6553, RFC6554, and IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation 
Draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo to the IESG.
November 2016            IESG Evaluation of draft-roll-routing-dispatch.

-- 
Peter van der Stok
vanderstok consultancy
mailto: consultancy@vanderstok.org
www: www.vanderstok.org
tel NL: +31(0)492474673     F: +33(0)966015248

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll