Re: [Roll] [roll] #135: Point to the Security Considerations section of RFC 6550
"Popa, Daniel" <Daniel.Popa@itron.com> Tue, 14 January 2014 14:28 UTC
Return-Path: <Daniel.Popa@itron.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E99C1AE0D5 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 06:28:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9U4CO5emb40 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 06:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0210.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2581ADBE5 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 06:28:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BY2PR04MB807.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.141.224.149) by BY2PR04MB806.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.141.224.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.842.7; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:28:32 +0000
Received: from BY2PR04MB807.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.224.149]) by BY2PR04MB807.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.224.149]) with mapi id 15.00.0842.003; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:28:32 +0000
From: "Popa, Daniel" <Daniel.Popa@itron.com>
To: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>, "clonvick@cisco.com" <clonvick@cisco.com>, "mariainesrobles@gmail.com" <mariainesrobles@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [roll] #135: Point to the Security Considerations section of RFC 6550
Thread-Index: AQHO+utphYj6q9McHEuH0gg3MWexxpqEc2eA
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:28:31 +0000
Message-ID: <7368afb294714efd9faf5aef5dc13e18@BY2PR04MB807.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <067.d2b714cc0ac70ebe3021413da1fe7ea3@trac.tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <067.d2b714cc0ac70ebe3021413da1fe7ea3@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [109.2.132.2]
x-forefront-prvs: 0091C8F1EB
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019001)(669001)(679001)(689001)(779001)(189002)(199002)(53754006)(288314003)(55784002)(54356001)(79102001)(53806001)(47736001)(54316002)(92566001)(49866001)(19580405001)(46102001)(50986001)(66066001)(65816001)(47976001)(63696002)(83322001)(80976001)(19580395003)(51856001)(2201001)(93136001)(81816001)(33646001)(76796001)(77982001)(56776001)(76482001)(59766001)(2656002)(76576001)(74876001)(87936001)(31966008)(4396001)(87266001)(81342001)(90146001)(85306002)(74662001)(81686001)(76786001)(80022001)(69226001)(56816005)(85852003)(15975445006)(83072002)(47446002)(15202345003)(74706001)(74366001)(74316001)(81542001)(74502001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR04MB806; H:BY2PR04MB807.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:109.2.132.2; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: itron.com
Cc: "draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #135: Point to the Security Considerations section of RFC 6550
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:28:54 -0000
Hello all, Chris, thank you for feedback. We will update the new revision of the draft accordingly. Regards, Daniel -----Message d'origine----- De : roll issue tracker [mailto:trac+roll@grenache.tools.ietf.org] Envoyé : mardi 17 décembre 2013 06:45 À : draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami.all@tools.ietf.org; mariainesrobles@gmail.com Cc : roll@ietf.org Objet : [roll] #135: Point to the Security Considerations section of RFC 6550 #135: Point to the Security Considerations section of RFC 6550 Source: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg04477.html From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick at cisco.com> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:41:54 -0800 (PST) “The document is incomplete but it appears that the authors know where they want to go with it. I would recommend that the Security Considerations section point to the Security Considerations section of RFC 6550 (RPL) and say that the roll- applicability-ami document is a description of the applicability of 6550 to the ami, therefore the considerations of 6550 apply.” -- -------------------------------------+---------------------------------- -------------------------------------+--- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-roll- mariainesrobles@gmail.com | applicability- Type: defect | ami.all@tools.ietf.org Priority: major | Status: new Component: applicability-ami | Milestone: Severity: Active WG Document | Version: | Keywords: -------------------------------------+---------------------------------- -------------------------------------+--- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/135> roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #135 (applicability-ami): Point… roll issue tracker
- [Roll] [roll] #135: Point to the Security Conside… roll issue tracker
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #135: Point to the Security Con… Popa, Daniel
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #135 (applicability-ami): Point… roll issue tracker