Re: [Roll] Published draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-03
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 02 September 2019 17:31 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5105120154 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pQP3_XCQOuPj for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A94120077 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC285380BE for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:30:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77D6E47 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:31:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1A1D3BDD-71EE-4C6A-BC07-2550C4011BC0@cisco.com>
References: <BYAPR11MB3558E623D03E8806E7A176A9D8BE0@BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>, <26984.1567436390@localhost> <1A1D3BDD-71EE-4C6A-BC07-2550C4011BC0@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 13:31:18 -0400
Message-ID: <29608.1567445478@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/e2yA-WArqyyHlW1pnNT_GimxlQ4>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Published draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-03
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 17:31:38 -0000
Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: >>> * Signal the capability by the root to proxy the EDAR in behalf of >>> the 6LR. Should we use the MOP draft or make it protocol independent >>> with 6CIO so any routing protocol could be used to proxy? >> >> I think we should use the root-announced (non-negotiated) capability. >> > Works for me >>> * Impact on useofrplinfo: the change that the (E flag) => >>> (non-storing signaling + tunnel to the 6LR) >> >> .... >> >>> Since those specs are not published yet, we could piggy-back the >>> changes there but that means taking the drafts off the RFC editor's >>> hands. >> >> I think that the useofrplinfo change affects only two (maybe) four of the 24 >> cases, and the case remains where we have an IPv6 Host only. >> So I think it is better to Updates: useofrplinfo. >> > Would you take the pen for this and the root capability? I’m looking at > the mop draft in parallel To clarify: My job is to document a capability (using mopex mechanism), in the unaware-leaves document so that the root can announce that it can process/proxy the EDAR. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [Roll] Published draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-03 Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Published draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leav… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Published draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leav… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Published draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leav… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Published draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leav… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)