Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 27 August 2018 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A630130DF9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fW2NvJ4AdVjk for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x930.google.com (mail-ua1-x930.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::930]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7AA8130DE6 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x930.google.com with SMTP id 101-v6so8880828uav.7 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ODszthVe7cY7TuanDd+OlV5xl1uEP9XZZLIEir6b3gQ=; b=GJ/dd3R8nRWigzRqa8Uw+pdJKHLs3yvvgAjMtlV/W6T9t8De/a560H4oghgYwDR4d4 VTHW5gZ3clV1aGXS7lhsSLTA9hF42zBvhwYjBMMQqo8D78qiKmdMDjii8xeUFs/nJnoL IPexIbwdlFHl75t5RcU4plvVOGDM52ORl7Lxq8s2/5/6wLZPItvj6kf29Rr0Y31L3Rdq ro75v+Li7xjljWZrA9oALUHXZPkVgoS8k9ItAuc3vUvm7NPZzLlALI5IPYaD5p/lc/wE hI0Gz8cGjicNz0omavt3/RMe3Yb2kwKyOA0yqPDyEeHl7KPu0L6DD2ZyC8lOjYnqIxgZ AHrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ODszthVe7cY7TuanDd+OlV5xl1uEP9XZZLIEir6b3gQ=; b=ObCO65y+w9EClHM4E8VWp6+UoNLjkxE30h50hGLSh6f2/wV2yY79FiZVdm4dRUfL0w egfK8EKQb7r/Ue8kxN8BuFWHejFK3zL3cLXVQZJL37xcWzOZV6i6IugfZ/D3dBfPThJh 74XxRNSm/UFM7aK95lPvqP/OeIjyThTCNXuGN93lnLfqlWTKS+5ZB7ldCkhIHVseNNyS yHL/gfshdP85M8ecsAU/CIawDUoSZlE35UBm0xp3dD0dGgsChv+IcSN4LzhsANM2eXDt kFOQiikH2+S6whuWFwNtL26L9QyPXDkkr8znHQJtZfdBFwOhcQ7PQFVJqEla8qmorHiV 46Zw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BJNcSra7KFmX+VG8HIFJW5XWPCzPOHshdAgqLaafY97G1dcsCF t0QqedqTnDLqXIi/qYSpr7pYHlrNCnVjgHXXcjAHHw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdauVCrpap3MUcuVtuy0OoBWOF2GxvYIU2s8UhX3v0kMbYMbdpDbOnplS5jVsD4Tn19URrWc2wkKqrQ6cwkLYQs=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2b87:: with SMTP id y7-v6mr8660889uai.109.1535381905535; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP+sJUdnS2Stv+-YsqvOrdc=s1jc_0E+UWKU=ErD1w+n9QaQOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO0Djp2VFLAnD=MKPeaASZ587LRS+apbQLP+oJZG6u1PsMq+Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+sJUfh4bWp8q=ZSQc8hh8s5vs5Ur07CoRF=vV6Mm3uWGFPfg@mail.gmail.com> <36c63d8e1c5944c287756750936050aa@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <36c63d8e1c5944c287756750936050aa@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 20:28:10 +0530
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp23UafJCEcewAkNQAMwXxe4kNcQ-qLNhw6CtDXODgXsdg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000012f83d05746bf568"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/e3csttSQL5SYm5jhDAOZgkwyaEE>
Subject: Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:58:30 -0000

Hello Pascal,

I pushed the latest drafts to datatracker.ietf.org last weekend. I just
verified if the drafts are uploaded ok.
Kindly let me know if there is any issue with  getting the latest drafts.
Thank you for considering to review.

Regards,
Rahul


On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 at 5:07 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello Rahul :
>
>
>
> Would you mind publishing your latest so other people could use that for
> their review?
>
> Sorry but I’m late in mine, and with the summer break, maybe others
> deferred their reviews as well?
>
>
>
> Many thanks;
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Ines Robles
> *Sent:* dimanche 26 août 2018 20:22
> *To:* Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets
>
>
>
> Excellent, Thank you very much Rahul.
>
>
>
> Ines.
>
>
>
> 2018-08-24 20:18 GMT+03:00 Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>:
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> For efficient NPDAO we have updated the text based on Remy's comments.
> Thank you Remy.
>
>
>
> For RPL-Observations, we have added a section which describes Motivation
> for this draft and clearly mentions that the draft is not intended for RFC
> track but as WG discussion track.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rahul
>
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 15:18, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=
> 40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Thank you very much for your reviews on the required drafts.
>
>
>
> So far we have:
>
>
>
> - For WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-03:  to add corrections by
> this thread:
> https://www..ietf..org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10568.html
> <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10568.html>
>
>
>
> - For for draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-04: to add corrections by this thread:
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10570.html
> <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10570..html>
>
>
>
> - WG Call for adoption: RPL-Observations. => Adopt this document.
>
> Could the authors please submit a new ietf draft with some text in the
> introduction explaining that this is a WG informational document, that is
> not intended for RFC track but as WG discussion track. Parts of the
> document may be used in other future RFCs.
>
>
>
> We have created new tickets to address the concerns discussed in IETF 101 [
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/roll/report/2]
>
>
>
> #179 Security considerations for dao projection
>
> #180 13 issues to address in dao projection draft (lifetime, MOP,
> retransmissions, route cleanup)
>
> #186 Useofrplinfo - AD review
>
> #187 New version of RFC6550 - Topics to include
>
> #188 Should 6LBR be included into the DODAG root?
>
> #189 RPL and new MOP?
>
>
>
> Are #189 and #187 strongly related in anybody's view?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Ines and Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>