[Roll] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-37.txt

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Sat, 14 March 2020 09:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66A33A0EDB for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LAm__eiKTwu0 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x932.google.com (mail-ua1-x932.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::932]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD953A0ED4 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x932.google.com with SMTP id a33so4599733uad.11 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O/oV+nz70n0DTal46c0a0H/aew39t1w3vyIHB1drNPU=; b=rRMdIZQc+MG9pTTfsPUQSsi3TChPVj/8VRnGNB81hc3fMdcFk/plf8oUvQqlXpzvUC hQk5yhC8PrWKssVn/npbbdn4Hffnpyl2GxITLQyP3J0aiTz07zk4yexvdVMBr3/AtpJx x0Q8eDQSd/K+CfDk1QIbWMqMUUUVuXaI/QRvTyWDLcsl+0CfgKW6GdsdwAkmMqdTn1/5 x0Ih7fahhlonuDbED3Fjbibnj/spQNitUjYkn8UkHPomVy2+s9gsTv3zInEL9Nn/AH4K nh4u2wF52Dzq92FXId26oCeEmHqDY2qyiV6ju1JXLZ3PYtIZGh1XcEmgqS2F1RyS6nfS m8Kg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O/oV+nz70n0DTal46c0a0H/aew39t1w3vyIHB1drNPU=; b=XUsbJw7yduxTOr8JKNoCy/Rnz3Al1UN0hH5V9SnAJfx9RkQG/aIIl7HYfAcSWsWvVQ cJ3pmOq5qBVYNO+cwyWNqDoYPQVnbvJZsjfNAx5+vOSNnl0mBKnJFa8LOvFY7ahfv+QA kkEs05rdxqQaGM/AUwaVYy0iE4DvuPSkN73IRF7CAEFtUV2LAtF2yjLhjAUvGFrY3OYH VgYl+RW1QxcPVfjxEoDS7JMNB49QgEyyK7p+cVna2afGrd+ix4zHt3gWeAuralCNdCEJ 0BPxMxyoN8qIQvOPHwKEPlh38/4kpiIJ663EnIw2BciBe1Vu+BJbk2yOqdCl/gDJQzW9 cphA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1IqsGJXZcyNhuovc7vI02iEsMy/88wlCCHzz9YaowlrORvup6h pUzoezFcEgvOsLZKT0G7/YfWfxEf8bTqg6SB6CP7LaMTRt8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsjOZ0YpyC7K3IcBxq4ZGEda7FZdQ7kDtuo99+LyoeV6dEHxtoMEZlleryVAAOSOtnDNrDmmcELJpMjdPUytBg=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:20d3:: with SMTP id z19mr52428ual.17.1584179971121; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158417982616.14048.6822584214206556327@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158417982616.14048.6822584214206556327@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:58:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUeWyLc3KKZVvbSjUR4KSV-bXFx_aDXjugG6v0Vg3JEZag@mail.gmail.com>
To: roll <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000070652305a0cda45f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/eE3IpZ8XCMuTsUZL9AWfJDpLgrg>
Subject: [Roll] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-37.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 09:59:43 -0000

Dear all,

The new version of useofrplinfo comprises:

-Figure 7 and respective cases:
-- Fix case SM: from root to RUL: we added encapsulation to the 6LR parent
of the RUL.
-- Fix case SM: from RAL to Internet: we added a case where there is
encapsulation to the root.
-- Fix case SM: from RAL to RUL: we added encapsulation from the root to
the 6LR parent of the RUL.

- We added two news assumptions:
--- For traffic leaving a RUL, if the RUL adds an opaque RPI then the
description of the RAL applies.
--- The description for RALs applies to RAN in general.

- Fixed some nits: Thank you very much Dominique and Rahul for your

Comments welcome,

The authors.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 11:57 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-37.txt
To: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, Maria Ines Robles <
mariainesrobles@gmail.com>, Michael C. Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>

A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-37.txt
has been successfully submitted by Maria Ines Robles and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo
Revision:       37
Title:          Using RPI Option Type, Routing Header for Source Routes and
IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation in the RPL Data Plane
Document date:  2020-03-14
Group:          roll
Pages:          60
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-37

   This document looks at different data flows through LLN (Low-Power
   and Lossy Networks) where RPL (IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power
   and Lossy Networks) is used to establish routing.  The document
   enumerates the cases where RFC6553 (RPI Option Type), RFC6554
   (Routing Header for Source Routes) and IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation is
   required in data plane.  This analysis provides the basis on which to
   design efficient compression of these headers.  This document updates
   RFC6553 adding a change to the RPI Option Type.  Additionally, this
   document updates RFC6550 defining a flag in the DIO Configuration
   option to indicate about this change and updates [RFC8138] as well to
   consider the new Option Type when the RPL Option is decompressed.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat