IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Last Call on MOP for AODV-RPL

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 12 October 2021 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11023A12B5 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4E5oe4n55JQq for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D04F83A12B2 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3112618013; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:39:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eMdojVEFLf8r; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEEE18010; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42D2CF8; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:39:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
cc: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUc=iDZAsMUw0L+H-orAKUWxxmm9hyerMS71Tjje0Smi+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CO1PR11MB48817BF59C64D77794A43F36D8B09@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxLxfNdPE+s11DqiwDuXg7auwVc953kgC_EZ28bugEWrA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+sJUc=iDZAsMUw0L+H-orAKUWxxmm9hyerMS71Tjje0Smi+g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:39:01 -0400
Message-ID: <6851.1634081941@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/eG0jlMvy7xk4_VJqv4a1MleIFIM>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Last Call on MOP for AODV-RPL
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 23:39:14 -0000

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > * Option 2: Assign MOP 4 (P2P RPL) to AODV-RPL:
    > -Action Points with this:
    > - IANA Considerations: request to add aodv-rpl as a reference in
    > the registry.
    > - A new section that talks about how the reuse is ok, and any
    > consequences of overlapping.  A requirement to not use both variations
    > (P2P-RPL and AODV-RPL) in the same network would be fine too.
    > - Are you aware of some deployment of P2P-RPL?

Works for me.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email