IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Mon, 27 August 2018 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8353130DCF for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 04:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bh2mcZB2lcBF for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 04:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C81F8130EBF for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 04:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16978; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1535369845; x=1536579445; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=RAyrBuyDJwigY3H5jKsj95lBDQIWdIHq1iEwLpTHyZY=; b=DgpqU3n4iCcnCPxvwjxixlWF678GM/l9qLDaaVKpMNJME9mGgy+3hZUo +0Jg+arpSMEQGux0fLCXVJd5UjOzaWPipFgLDOsg+1ds7vFCRdzSpUIzE 8AIpE0AeT/G0+n1IeV5pty+UEl6/+Amn3BxiffWg/uoZe3aVtAp2OAOSl 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CjAADw4YNb/51dJa1aGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJXeGV/KAqDZ4gQjCSCDYhUiB+FMxSBZgsYAQqDEoE3AheDDiE0GAECAQECAQECbRwMhTcBAQEBAwEBGwYKQQsQAgEIEQQBASgDAgICHwYLFAkIAgQOBQiDGoEdTAMVD6JCgS6HJA2DLAWJVheBQT+BEoJkLoFBAYEURQEBAQGBJxgBAQIMJx+CS4JXAo0JhVKIJisJAoYxhiyDCB+BP4QyiFiLHWOHIgIRFIEkHTiBUnAVO4JpgXWJIIU+bwGKW4EfgRwBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,295,1531785600"; d="scan'208,217";a="162971120"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Aug 2018 11:37:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w7RBbOIL004289 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:37:24 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:37:23 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:37:23 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "Rahul Arvind Jadhav (Rahul Arvind Jadhav, 2012 Labs)" <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com>
CC: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets
Thread-Index: AQHUOTQYiruIJ4FLi0+T9p63jOOTcKTPfjoAgAM2ZwCAAMyNsA==
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:37:21 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:36:19 +0000
Message-ID: <36c63d8e1c5944c287756750936050aa@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <CAP+sJUdnS2Stv+-YsqvOrdc=s1jc_0E+UWKU=ErD1w+n9QaQOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO0Djp2VFLAnD=MKPeaASZ587LRS+apbQLP+oJZG6u1PsMq+Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+sJUfh4bWp8q=ZSQc8hh8s5vs5Ur07CoRF=vV6Mm3uWGFPfg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUfh4bWp8q=ZSQc8hh8s5vs5Ur07CoRF=vV6Mm3uWGFPfg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.55.22.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_36c63d8e1c5944c287756750936050aaXCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/esKBbgy_3tTj2UCE-aj-IiJzkx0>
Subject: Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:37:28 -0000

Hello Rahul :

Would you mind publishing your latest so other people could use that for their review?
Sorry but I’m late in mine, and with the summer break, maybe others deferred their reviews as well?

Many thanks;

Pascal

From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Ines Robles
Sent: dimanche 26 août 2018 20:22
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets

Excellent, Thank you very much Rahul.

Ines.

2018-08-24 20:18 GMT+03:00 Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:rahul.ietf@gmail.com>>:
Hello All,

For efficient NPDAO we have updated the text based on Remy's comments. Thank you Remy.

For RPL-Observations, we have added a section which describes Motivation for this draft and clearly mentions that the draft is not intended for RFC track but as WG discussion track.

Regards,
Rahul

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 15:18, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
Dear all,

Thank you very much for your reviews on the required drafts.

So far we have:

- For WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-03:  to add corrections by this thread: https://www..ietf..org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10568.html<https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10568.html>

- For for draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-04: to add corrections by this thread: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10570.html<https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10570..html>

- WG Call for adoption: RPL-Observations. => Adopt this document.
Could the authors please submit a new ietf draft with some text in the introduction explaining that this is a WG informational document, that is not intended for RFC track but as WG discussion track. Parts of the document may be used in other future RFCs.

We have created new tickets to address the concerns discussed in IETF 101 [https://trac.ietf.org/trac/roll/report/2]

#179 Security considerations for dao projection
#180 13 issues to address in dao projection draft (lifetime, MOP, retransmissions, route cleanup)
#186 Useofrplinfo - AD review
#187 New version of RFC6550 - Topics to include
#188 Should 6LBR be included into the DODAG root?
#189 RPL and new MOP?

Are #189 and #187 strongly related in anybody's view?


Thanks,

Ines and Peter
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org<mailto:Roll@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org<mailto:Roll@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email