Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 21 November 2019 06:50 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EDA120143 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:50:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQ2C1ArnX6E3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 039DE120271 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id c19so1955327otr.11 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:50:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dgBWZT4sjRvvxwJLCKdyHxu3pzsDhL6A1l3tjoX9ViM=; b=MaNGL1AFwwI0c0vNG2Sgc5zVtqoDxYaQxZsFZvgmtOJwCAM8RpDL329adtWKX6/9Hr qR9XAMiQ5DZOOgaCevTMF9RImPmoQ7+yxTOQtIodxU0WS7sWZDd4zb9ZQw8lnePq4bEg vhO2I3tHa9kNOzjxBcxt+VNGavNrtTQ9ILLl0RRSx58p4u/BzOw4EDYmFgg/pdcOOsz3 sYhKi7NT1rWx0nODpRiJEiZI2ilGkRsgsZemzay7nhyc+Dx8rQ36oLyCWHTMjb2f0lh9 FKWmeXnttDwdFojuKrPjXIt+NqQSjcwc8Zyb8r7HCVvqJldm/5ecAML7Cl24yLuXCnzf rDfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=dgBWZT4sjRvvxwJLCKdyHxu3pzsDhL6A1l3tjoX9ViM=; b=I0WoaP3mhcOqpMtZBdG5BoFgZBsMGN2PJbjcT+PV9swfEx6zxxnyFzSIsDAPrri4fQ gMWFR00I3P6V5Zb3G6ctQ47hvj5bKX0+Sn32YJ7W7WxEIGuq4at8MFStfVIIveneHSAT esFU0p8C3GiSjqRF62y3uI15dhLCXGwGJtqc89D647bqfFjlfDlotV1Hr9kD+SrmAOjj S9mLwQ8wpVbOxFXQsShqM6CdftKVPXSIreTqewEXX4cpqhQhhNZgF1L1ORCZkFzE8c3p CpiP9fGTuS3ejh6LMc+PqlK5kBtuuXRl/t4+jqt2jCAG1OetIU/dqhNzffZ4C5mG8mku c03w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXUTIJKYq60MMD5NByN2WS4dFOxlQFWjMWMhsCvXPGGk+sB14qO Gyk3BgmPL5v3QQHRoEFrMUS1QAXRc0AqVRr8jbJV8g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw1PGMWx4M2/tVj5kR+b2afIQ149spTbkBA4op2Fqm7N+ScVZNdR5QX6vrejuPwU8ULYZXMbDcQvoFF2+22MMs=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7ad7:: with SMTP id m23mr5321939otn.190.1574319033223; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:50:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAO0Djp20PRZnzTO4pU0KPmiCPcdEiitJYLdoLWOmOkgj6-vzmA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO0Djp20PRZnzTO4pU0KPmiCPcdEiitJYLdoLWOmOkgj6-vzmA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:50:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_CmS4QAF4X_LvVQ75eSQAjhrRunQyRRyBWUTACx7Z4uA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bd0d800597d5b65f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/fJ_W42lRyHj3QqFs0Wu-NLQq7Vg>
Subject: Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:50:36 -0000
I support that. AB On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:46 PM Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > During IETF106 we discussed splitting up MOPex and capabilities, > reasons have been: > 1. MOPex and capabilities are not dependent on each other > 2. Capabilities draft may take a while for WGLC, while MOPex can be > shipped sooner. > > Please let us know of your opinions. > > The following is the link for the separated draft. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jadhav-roll-mopex/ > > Reviews are highly appreciated. > > Thanks, > Rahul > > _______________________________________________ > Roll mailing list > Roll@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll >
- [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup Rahul Jadhav
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup Georgios Z. Papadopoulos
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup rabi narayan sahoo
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup Rahul Jadhav
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup rabi narayan sahoo
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup dominique.barthel
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup Rahul Jadhav
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup dominique.barthel
- Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup Rahul Jadhav