Re: [Roll] [6lowpan] draft-bormann-ghc

I don't know -- it could be handled as AD sponsored.  I'm confident we'll find a way.

More interesting is *when* it should go.  I'm in the process of obtaining research results that might improve the performance with DTLS packets a bit (with minimal implementation impact). We could rush GHC before that is complete, wait a couple of months for these results, or even try to get more input.  What is the best timing? We need input from implementers to decide this.

Sent from Mobile

On 24.08.2012, at 21:52, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:

> 
>>>>>> "Carsten" == Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> writes:
>    Carsten> Changing to WG chair mode for a moment:
> 
>    Carsten> The 6LoWPAN WG is alive and well and is in the process of
>    Carsten> closing its remaining two work items (6LoWPAN-ND, 6LoWPAN
>    Carsten> for BTLE). 
> 
>    Carsten> However, you are right in that the 6LoWPAN WG no longer takes new work on.
>    Carsten> The chairs, with the ADs and the chairs of other WGs, will
>    Carsten> ensure that interesting work finds an appropriate home.
> 
> ...? where will GHC go?
> 
> -- 
> Michael Richardson
> -at the cottage-
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> 6lowpan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan