IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] AMI applicability: storing/non-storing.

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 15 November 2013 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB3821F9B4B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:40:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.246, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-53K2FhLTQD for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:40:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FD511E810C for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:40:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEA520087 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:52:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 1F42363B88; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:40:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBF163AEF for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:40:02 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CEAB84CE.250ED%d.sturek@att.net>
References: <CEAB84CE.250ED%d.sturek@att.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:40:02 -0500
Message-ID: <27979.1384544402@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Roll] AMI applicability: storing/non-storing.
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:40:08 -0000

Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net> wrote:
    > If you go back in the ROLL archives, you will see the discussion on a
    > hybrid storing/non-storing deployment.

    > I think there was a good deal of discussion at the time on complexity and
    > it was decided (by the ROLL design team) not to pursue development.

It wasn't just that it was complex; it was that we couldn't come up with a
use case that would justify that complexity at the time.

My opinion is that the AMI people have such a use case and should pursue
writing something up.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email