[Roll] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-14: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 09 September 2020 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietf.org
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A203A0E22; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 07:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138@ietf.org, roll-chairs@ietf.org, roll@ietf.org, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, mariainesrobles@googlemail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.16.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <159966310991.32249.4584030650116177263@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 07:51:50 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/hZwhqZbR0zIjh89Cdjfnmd5GZck>
Subject: [Roll] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:51:51 -0000

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 5.  Typo. s/an homogenous/a homogeneous/

Section 7.  Editorial. To be clearer on where the attacker is in the topology
and on who is incurring the cost:

OLD
An attacker in the middle of the network may reset the "T" flag to cause extra
energy spending in its subDAG.

NEW
An on-path attacker may reset the “T” flag to force additional energy
consumption by the nodes in the subDAG.