[Roll] eliding mop ext

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 24 July 2019 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D37120141 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BPPJXzH3Fxbp for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80DE51200CE for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:6e88:14ff:fe34:93bc]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9286C1F44B for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:51:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 074DE1B00; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:52:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <MN2PR11MB3565208120ABC989AD1C875BD8C60@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAP+sJUeRLpY=+ZSkXJCJFru9H0pyACvpQ8QtcC80O2qjn38R_w@mail.gmail.com> <30689.1564003876@dooku.sandelman.ca> <MN2PR11MB3565208120ABC989AD1C875BD8C60@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> message dated "Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:47:35 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:52:04 -0400
Message-ID: <632.1564005124@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/hmTaNpo_3HCmryOgCX9EMDwYLXo>
Subject: [Roll] eliding mop ext
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:51:46 -0000

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > The suggestion I made at the mike in addition to this was that 7 in the
    > MOP means that the MOP is in the ext. If there is no ext then the MOP
    > is elided in this DIO, need to wait for the next one.

the mop is in every DIO.
You are suggesting that the mopext might not need to be sent in every DIO?

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [