IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Last Call on MOP for AODV-RPL

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Wed, 20 October 2021 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AB43A058F for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k9IFJvow53zL for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77D2A3A0477 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id b189-20020a1c1bc6000000b0030da052dd4fso10926354wmb.3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=54rLFzG7G1E4TPG2S0K/CpC+rc8jEhqG2WUBri6gZ+Q=; b=dSh8KhzPgIB+BnuyzzfWBDeGaD36ri1gLRKnIpaVZwZORa5+UCyy8y8lXjHRm5qmf7 nyf1BfS+4TLVHIhfs8urnwhWX+Xo5R8+GbknXeSb6ladEVCgYzUJTluQPmWLqC8FCmw3 5NsjRywVDZAVS5WPY6QOBBbYG6YD8fq1iVl0TcPfTNXDZGteNWEQ7trivZ5QWKnlT25P FWs31X8g1ZzTYn1PfzsI3pEgOcqkKcArhTIOAKLBKAyBxFqzmLLfGbfIgEHronNoveyD EhZDAUBjf5hzlFM+cGlWR+2KiYRrSm8C/4uLpbRwz+v/eTEpZOgeKmukTgKlcMewg/A9 BnXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=54rLFzG7G1E4TPG2S0K/CpC+rc8jEhqG2WUBri6gZ+Q=; b=v1WKyb7O1ALLEFbG8TGUAh8RpAcyr0sc29qgYYwda/3DI4/j17z1myEjueVbhuB8C2 8ttzpGm9VBk5POnXAoBkDi1pVx1vFSW7VrCA4ePbGmo0w4N6K83U28fVAVX1X8DeHSVU sQdWgmx+ix1w1J7oBD5mnxrUYM5Baq9WsASeEcdYuCQ7zJVCy097oWiOphMfUe5h73Nz EwBPFwii9hI16g8KC8qzYLtlshgoi7frsDch7kGJ3GnU7wDBimya4M3lsug6JWEaosVz LWbYdXiQIiHChGevhnbH5O1v/nKfZh++3AQgHBfq9ZWugoNCO8HpHaoUcNZOIzDgMeLf hgLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531NzNUdYNzv8uTp4+hxuIULJ6DEVQIh41YlKHGI4L/K7eUIGzgB 27uo5cKHpvZRrDCaS4qNefmW1mstY1TAbid3MDmM5u2zxy0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZCAz7F+NIQCeLC/QA8lq8qW4/N312AH0iboYlJLSyvWFSYMNOz2C8Vlmx5AgpClDhHncgc9S9n6VXQYvhM88=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c10:: with SMTP id j16mr475355wms.28.1634741841346; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO1PR11MB48817BF59C64D77794A43F36D8B09@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxLxfNdPE+s11DqiwDuXg7auwVc953kgC_EZ28bugEWrA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+sJUc=iDZAsMUw0L+H-orAKUWxxmm9hyerMS71Tjje0Smi+g@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88bgDUuitoVhtbk8qTdMJcYVzocWybRcAZsGhKEsd9uLg@mail.gmail.com> <4422.1634681303@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <4422.1634681303@localhost>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:56:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_4LBaKsj3oP3h8xbfD28--Fvg0a_SMb4J-8t3dyEzDYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c0c51005cec9fe49"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/iDxZFVWpCgxYUscgkuY8MyhDLz0>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Last Call on MOP for AODV-RPL
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:57:31 -0000

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:08 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > I think it is better to assign AODV_RPL using 5. Not sure why just
>     > because not much used P2P_RPL we change to another protocol, is this
>     > option taken often in IETF WGs.
>
> Until we do RPL v2 with MOPEX, we'll have only 1 MOP value left (6).
> AODV_RPL replaces/upgrades P2P_RPL.
> We think that P2P_RPL isn't widely deployed.
>
> I replied to the request of WG chair asking what WG thinks.
The AD commented before that there was not much discussion in WG which is
negative sign.
It is still difficult to notice what the WG thinks, so not sure what you
mean by We_think.

AB

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status