Re: [Roll] I-D When to use RFC 6553, 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6-

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Sun, 28 June 2015 10:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1C71A21B8; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 03:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CopwnJm_g8r2; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 03:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com (mail-la0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62A0C1A0545; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 03:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lacny3 with SMTP id ny3so96401366lac.3; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 03:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=F4svrnMqY8FAQBMe+TunhjtLzxPbT5VQDTla1bVfXRc=; b=SJ+jLOgI6Wm0ZmAt5fh1F3Vjew4ed3o5U2SD3vxk/DH7IP95YL2okBUc4zsapsADqT +l2Hid2NHNgc86CV1xUjeAUTXkEVHji+WOE/RALwzKUYFVDLBKhjbzpbQ3yFhvSmEb0R hCknpM/Qwj2NspHOQIfDSgxADlFqVx1Vh61d18GYmyAtP9nDCZsMDYmgn3bsFFC/uxl1 IvOpNX7Z1ze3fZj+67AsJuI0tCgXTF4tqWbFj2Jdx6SlcfzD9U/dsTbUPsP+qouqzYWX hOz5jTtAqE2cuLvXB7inB/LpSMppPTBnBycaoZCa/9cLUNCdTsfnT/YKxDQS3LAA9jr1 kEOw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.9.5 with SMTP id v5mr9140011laa.111.1435486878824; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 03:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.208.70 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 03:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADJ9OA-eXTe=b2kwBMGy8szNhN1LW_LV9MUEXA2+HPAEmk+SVg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUc7u-V84kN6bT-+4xLRiTMeLu+QcF+BJWG0AjW594GTQg@mail.gmail.com> <CADJ9OA-eXTe=b2kwBMGy8szNhN1LW_LV9MUEXA2+HPAEmk+SVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 13:21:18 +0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUcCtym4nVFe+eWYceoY2wWdXeooR-XnS-00+XSzmva+6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e014944f67dfefe05199155bd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/iLW17DCGu4Mu8N2C9MaTMYnxZss>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] I-D When to use RFC 6553, 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6-
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 10:21:24 -0000

Great! Thanks a lot :-)

On 27 Jun 2015 12:47, "Thomas Watteyne" <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:

> Ines,
>
> Great to see this I-D exists!
>
> CC'ing the 6TISCH ML, as these questions have been discussed extensively
> there as well.
> We will verify that the rules you describe as followed
> in draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal and in the test specifications for the
> upcoming 6TiSCH plugtest.
> Give us a couple of days to review and provide feedback.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Ines Robles <
> mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Please find a draft related to our work item:
>>
>> "- Details about when to use RFC6553, RFC6554, and IPv6-in-IPv6
>> encapsulation."
>>
>> We are requesting for comments and for additional authors.
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance,
>>
>> Michael and Ines.
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification
>> for draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo-00.txtDate: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:09:29
>> -0700From: internet-drafts@ietf.orgTo: Ines Robles <
>> maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com>gt;, Michael C. Richardson <
>> mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>gt;, Maria Ines Robles <maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com>om>,
>> Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo-00.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Maria Ines Robles and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>>
>> Name:		draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo
>> Revision:	00
>> Title:		When to use RFC 6553, 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6
>> Document date:	2015-06-27
>> Group:		Individual Submission
>> Pages:		9
>> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo-00.txt
>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo/
>> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo-00
>>
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This document states different cases where RFC 6553, RFC 6554 and
>>    IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation is required to set the bases to help
>>    defining the compression of RPL routing information in LLN
>>    environments.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>