Re: [Roll] Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-04

Yusuke, Peter, thanks for detailed review and changes.

Jari

On 02 Jul 2015, at 11:26, Yusuke DOI <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:

> Dear Peter,
> 
> Thank you for review. I submitted -06 (-05 contains some nits) as a revised version.
> 
> On 2015-06-26 08:15, Peter Yee wrote:
>> Some of the parameters are described with their bit lengths, others are not.
>> Lengths are listed haphazardly.  Be consistent in either including them or
>> not.  Timer lengths are listed as n-bit integers, but this may be confusing
>> given that the document says "Short floating point format is used to
>> describe the wide range of timer values".  So, are the timer values floating
>> point or integer?  Is the combined implication supposed to be that the
>> numbers are formatted as floating point (for greater range), but only take
>> on integer values?  Given that the values in this document are all given in
>> reference to division by the value of TUNIT, it's possible that values might
>> not be integers.  If that happens and only integers are desired, is rounding
>> or truncation preferred?  Also note that Appendix A indicates that "short
>> unsigned floating point" was dropped.  It's not completely clear if that
>> means that "short [signed?] floating point" was adopted in its stead or
>> whether actual short integers were preferred.
> 
> Short floating point is dropped but some texts have not removed (my mistake). Thank you for pointing out. All values should be in integer.
> 
> Thank you again for your efforts on review (and sorry for lot of nits...)
> 
> Yusuke
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

Re: [Roll] Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-04

Attachment: signature.asc