IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Consensus Call -- resolution for #132: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-04 - Clarify scope value of 3 - subnet-local

"Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com> Sun, 03 November 2013 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6100421F9BC2 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:16:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yTSNDiKhdCOt for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:16:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D699821F9B07 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:16:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3192; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383520594; x=1384730194; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=tmjVDitb97MCN43bc98obI7xdoo6nY8EYdcY1mwLcL0=; b=QTvlrHEkueo71zZvJg8LItT5coiLnuRtZ4kWQgwQAYQeH2MwBD0UFm7h qddMPNWgQkZuhqRJLRM567eWs43tKXhSWd1d8dBUlljnAT/1J6AArX2IM EnGt1acr6d0lznepHYecBj04EfDRQTObDi4potU8D77Ta4JJMvvHhBjJ3 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhQFAM/YdlKtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABYgkNEwFqBGhZ0giYBAQR5EAIBCAQ3BAcyFBECBA4FiAG9XI9YB4MggQ4DmAqSCYFogT4
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,628,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="280172321"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2013 23:16:33 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA3NGXWv029720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:16:33 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.9.227]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:16:32 -0600
From: "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] Consensus Call -- resolution for #132: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-04 - Clarify scope value of 3 - subnet-local
Thread-Index: AQHO2MLB6q/7EA0AAk2/5DY+O9XmRZoUI/Ag
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 23:16:31 +0000
Message-ID: <B87A1A82-632C-4B94-A053-5C4D6A613964@cisco.com>
References: <067.7473226c34e99536104b136c326ce300@trac.tools.ietf.org> <082.6d923b56e89f979e00a33a1bab8bbfc5@trac.tools.ietf.org> <13799.1383338682@sandelman.ca> <674F70E5F2BE564CB06B6901FD3DD78B1888633B@tgxml338.toshiba.local>, <4887.1383503416@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4887.1383503416@sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B87A1A82632C4B94A0535C4D6A613964ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, "Jonathan Hui (johui)" <johui@cisco.com>, "mariainesrobles@gmail.com" <mariainesrobles@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Consensus Call -- resolution for #132: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-04 - Clarify scope value of 3 - subnet-local
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 23:16:46 -0000


On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:30 AM, "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca<mailto:mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>> wrote:


<yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp<mailto:yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>> wrote:
I prefer describing 802.15.4-specific realm-local scope boundary
definition in another RFC so that both trickle-mcast and
multicast-scopes drafts are fully independent of any link-layer.

Are you willing to write this document?

In my opinion, the roll WG gets to answer the question "should realm-specific scope for 802.15.4 be defined in draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast?"

If the consensus is no (which would be my answer), then, in my opinion, it's up to 6nan to decide between putting the definition in the multicast scopes doc or a separate RFC.

- Ralph


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca<mailto:mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>>, Sandelman Software Works

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email