Re: [Roll] interest in mixed network topology

정종수 <jsjeong@etri.re.kr> Fri, 14 February 2014 05:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jsjeong@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479611A00E2 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:08:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2tvJvKVvZ5_0 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:08:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpeg.etri.re.kr (smtpeg2.etri.re.kr [129.254.27.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F8F1A00CF for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:08:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SMTP2.etri.info (129.254.28.72) by SMTPEG2.etri.info (129.254.27.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:08:42 +0900
Received: from SMTP4.etri.info ([169.254.3.218]) by SMTP2.etri.info ([169.254.170.108]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:08:40 +0900
From: =?utf-8?B?7KCV7KKF7IiY?= <jsjeong@etri.re.kr>
To: "Gillmore, Matthew" <Matthew.Gillmore@itron.com>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] interest in mixed network topology
Thread-Index: AQHPJ2DU+SETlneSuUOfkUqMCXHQR5qxgXOAgAFcPwCAADMfAIAAHGAAgABy0AA=
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 05:08:39 +0000
Message-ID: <FB105932-CFC7-4DBE-A1D5-16223925AA51@etri.re.kr>
References: <30140.1392147480@sandelman.ca> <61C053F3-F4FE-41FC-804A-184184660F2F@tzi.org> <19014.1392312790@sandelman.ca> <B553DE17-9AED-45D1-ABA6-7842F6F8CD8F@tzi.org> <efd095b3f3334f728460c3de06b88060@CO1PR04MB553.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <efd095b3f3334f728460c3de06b88060@CO1PR04MB553.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: ko-KR, en-US
Content-Language: ko-KR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [129.254.192.201]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4F2E4144F7DCC647A263966B5E6324C2@etri.re.kr>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/j4JmHZpVUO6GUzt2P46v7Wyf3ls
Cc: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, "draft-ko-roll-mix-network-pathology@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ko-roll-mix-network-pathology@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] interest in mixed network topology
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 05:08:46 -0000

Thanks for your interests.

I also wonder the method for mixing storing and non-storing modes that we described in the draft is feasible or not.
We suggested a new MOP that requires a few minor changes from existing storing mode and non-storing mode.

Thanks.
-Jongsoo

On Feb 14, 2014, at 7:17 AM, Gillmore, Matthew <Matthew.Gillmore@itron.com> wrote:

> 
> I agree with Carsten,  a solution for a hybrid of storing mode and non-storing mode is very interesting.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Matthew Gillmore
> Strategic Standards Architect, Office of the CTO
> Mobile: +1.517.745.7350
> Knowledge to Shape Your Future
>       
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:36 PM
> To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
> Cc: Ines Robles; draft-ko-roll-mix-network-pathology@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Roll] interest in mixed network topology
> 
> Well,
> 
>> The metering people (AMI) specified storing mode in the applicability 
>> statement.  Traffic distance doesn't matter as it's almost all p2mp.
> 
> It's easy to "leave the door open" in an applicability statement.
> (BTW, is that document alive?  I haven't been paying attention.)
> 
> I would be more interested in hearing about people who actually build things that way.
> 
>> I understand your statement to be disinterest in new partial storing modes.
> 
> No, I find the problem intriguing.  It just seems to me that storing mode isn't actually being used outside research.
> If a hybrid mode could make the introduction of storing nodes a more useful proposition, that would be an interesting result of this work.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll