IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] [roll] #132: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-04 - Clarify scope value of 3 - subnet-local

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 15 October 2013 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C7921F9DD6 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.268
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.268 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.331, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5fOvr2zIfOBb for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266E011E813D for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB162017F; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:20:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 891CE63B88; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:09:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A19963AEF; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:09:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CE82BA46.24343%d.sturek@att.net>
References: <CE82BA46.24343%d.sturek@att.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:09:46 -0400
Message-ID: <18379.1381856986@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: mariainesrobles@gmail.com, johui@cisco.com, rdroms@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #132: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-04 - Clarify scope value of 3 - subnet-local
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:09:56 -0000

Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net> wrote:
    > Also, I am in favor of Ralph's proposal on using PAN ID for MPL scope
    > 3.  I don't see how any automatic configuration could take place if we
    > can't identify a concrete identifier for the scope.  The other
    > alternative (and to be honest the one I thought we were going to use)
    > is DODAG ID.  This would allow your scenario where a subnet of
    > different link technologies could support MPL domain 3.

I like DODAG ID. That suits me fine.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email