Re: [Roll] Request for Comments for ROLL Charter

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Wed, 29 June 2016 07:06 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6ED12DA13 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72gSMDQI7Zbp for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAEF412B009 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.208]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id CX5x1t00F4VN29601X5xfV; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:05:57 +0200
Received: from AMontpellier-654-1-15-89.w109-210.abo.wanadoo.fr ([109.210.238.89]) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:05:57 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:05:57 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <CAH7SZV-yuc8Zx6NBi_vMHZMFqEwZuKb25hewE2w1CC48yNyZ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUdRQHJhuszRLmMLoObVVELTGKAboPZpjHRV1M1t3T1BpA@mail.gmail.com> <962ecd511f1b4629bcf329790509bb0c@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <17987.1467118035@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <7887a2c930bd4eb3b90da72e2bbe914b@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <ec28f1cd-5f5e-43d9-bfc6-706a8b3116f2@gmail.com> <CAH7SZV-yuc8Zx6NBi_vMHZMFqEwZuKb25hewE2w1CC48yNyZ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d9eb6a59c4206fe735a69e2d6ba57724@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (noXnad6EISP8veNt4HTvpX+gtNuvzIcG)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/klhfUAdWd3C6MNw5yFfntZUFQaA>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Request for Comments for ROLL Charter
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 07:06:00 -0000

Hi All,

If I understand correctly the discussion, the proposal is to replace

"Additional protocol to  reduce paths for RPL in non-storing mode."

by

"Additional protocol elements to reduce packet size and/or the amount of 
accumulated routing states."

As a side remark:
I don't like "through the air", Radio also works in vacuum.

Peter