IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Agenda for Monday (Re: MOP==7 live discussion )

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Mon, 21 September 2020 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FE33A0CA9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 04:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=WNKKxI4P; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=FXFcf0oX
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MNOldsbd4Zxw for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 04:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA123A0CA3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 04:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2978; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1600687346; x=1601896946; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=9Jkxwh9H7ZuOsVOe+lQQUI1TuDr7+ExaehV5NvM9roo=; b=WNKKxI4P+kxVChJT+LpuNjsDrsb1xrOxXyhFre61hHd7KsewJu2h2FHJ MTW1CsIzQWa32Lw7io4ZvnwMay1GGKtZC0HJiZyhE146E1Z6r/bpGX2b0 3EMQ2KbLAFzk586Vtj3dDKW63Enfz07F3GuOkRP2yik+aoVIJf20aXzFa I=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:SsE8wRyb6G2haxbXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRaHt+5kilPEWYDS7bRPgrmev6PhXDkG5pCM+DAHfYdXXhAIwcMRg0Q7AcGDBEG6SZyibyEzEMlYElMw+Xa9PBtOEcDyalnXq3v05jdBUhn6PBB+c+LyHIOahs+r1ue0rpvUZQgAhDe0bb5oahusqgCEvcgNiowkIaE0mRY=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DzCQD6i2hf/5hdJa1fHgE8DAILFYMhUQeBSS8shDqDRgONdYoOjmaCUwNVCwEBAQ0BAS0CBAEBgVaCdQIXghQCJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVcDIVyAQEBAQMSEREMAQEuCgsEAgEIEQQBAQMCJgICAh8RFQgIAgQBEggahVADLgGpEwKBOYhhdoEygwEBAQWFHA0LghAJgQ4qgnGDaYZSG4FBP4ERQ4JNPoIaghQRgxUzgi2TM6MuUQqCZ5VEhSmDDI8xjkSSe4F3i1SSMQIEAgQFAg4BAQWBayOBV3AVgyRQFwINWJE4ilZ0NwIGAQkBAQMJfIsfgkQBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,286,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="545809713"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 Sep 2020 11:22:25 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08LBMPTf023239 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:22:25 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:22:24 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:22:24 -0500
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:22:24 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=cRee2log8l7cIqjn3M0kpt5aAdkwYzWxAQYhneTy6lFMpLZCzk72Kxzob59jN71ms4TZ9YQhgTkRBqzhvU9uM2YXIsAGc8ROmwZz/uVGcRGdQkh+dAammAskV7KIB61m2zpdOVAVd0597rhgAMBcJb2tVaoMOKC8imYVphTsYvBwvicchr+m/MHbHYJwg/3AZM4/rebdnN7Vidh/SBLzN/tqhms5PSx+cJoJa3erFORvAUStWisRPUfgXNAEq0O1PD2/aYudHV51XXmR9h1CV7nyYLYFtzLUbvTnjUbwxfmFVmrYRoQV3Bfo1Avqw/TaWwAOuGy16AJA658gG176gA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9Jkxwh9H7ZuOsVOe+lQQUI1TuDr7+ExaehV5NvM9roo=; b=oeLmyuigNEIRGeovP4JYjnvmDUNzq967lXuzaJuLz3pQTPxkcwBGWlzXhgyRGoTP6WiVxgsWehtvXDlG6W0eE4cO4hDBtcmYY+ZeaF+V9E3yYIcL06FQe0z0cWlUVZeJ2VbKvLXUiThsbO3vnfv2SM7AO+cdajtt2YU1G412BAEaviqX67kerHRSfpYuGNV6bSIjH+zkk/eL/mi5yLleRVe4+ifHa/xT6w0XTUU1qGiopPDcx5fE7XJUW1WyzSF5ZXDWwLVG07S5bKZCTnXAQvYAAqNf4sZNCRwSse0R8qisRcy+kNMAaSGVweJC1ccQ3llGTrT2Doq8/s0fOhSwdg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9Jkxwh9H7ZuOsVOe+lQQUI1TuDr7+ExaehV5NvM9roo=; b=FXFcf0oX43tiXzA7dUzgImy8EKD1jO0p1IL8L1+pz5UldSPAtfAkTqAXJOlvNUsRduBcHsZKNGVPDKMnqJ9PxtNOftOpst4IgDutRNh5GO25jXugZ/QuDSetxwGE+7HvkeK3SdqCXJoq90u6MNOsVQN/NDYIFpxAxRw9XcM1WZk=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:b3::11) by BY5PR11MB4151.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:18f::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.19; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:22:24 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1835:beb0:16e1:e860]) by BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1835:beb0:16e1:e860%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3391.026; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:22:24 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Agenda for Monday (Re: MOP==7 live discussion )
Thread-Index: AQHWkAly3QwwksbfBEWxQs+gHkXNIg==
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:22:11 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:21:48 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB355839686C4B2CB0BF17CC21D83A0@BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159968972884.1065.3876077471852624744@ietfa.amsl.com> <MN2PR11MB35659A0710E687A7C9995E6ED8270@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20200910200744.GE89563@kduck.mit.edu> <17053.1599841430@localhost> <20200911162617.GQ89563@kduck.mit.edu> <8F19C753-DCA0-4A32-BA3B-A124B2F7F745@cisco.com> <MN2PR11MB3565F2602A0DC55DE9FF3604D83F0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESswYqh_XdHMkQRCzKrJAdj_iH1DOuz7qy+RFiECUwK6OnQ@mail.gmail.com> <117301.1600480771@dooku>, <CAP+sJUcGQQE4WJfJe56p8dGH2_W80KY=5bHsGzQeTOLEazKxXA@mail.gmail.com> <9778D10D-91FE-496B-B679-8A3E8B7B5300@cisco.com> <15752.1600553316@localhost> <5049.1600648267@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <5049.1600648267@localhost>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: sandelman.ca; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;sandelman.ca; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a01:cb1d:4ec:2200:6846:1faa:66d6:dfb6]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 06064ccd-0eec-4125-d5e5-08d85e209d21
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4151:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB4151C894450C44307E2D71F3D83A0@BY5PR11MB4151.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 72EX7709LZgD6ftnzT8Cx2SJNjzFkmmrsZm0yXO71clY4/n0ztRjSJkJF3coqtd2r2j3uYNpXe1pSvp5lrOM1Tev3xoqhtC0DKxNu/HTVSg+xYCPlbA7JdfPYzQtysDCr5x+/Oxa7XlBFsKBfvukBDdwcwuZGmcViyYK7/rLFZ+mXaTLsEs24kTvp7T4YdKwZ2IG7bNsqYxyI+Wt0dIIWOr68vHNaDTz6N20cePVpCQDQgfAg2OQF36dQ6O2jbRezvKUGzO99sykE2/jB+FPbO7zauj1V+DqGsZCzvzE5lfzZUdk9ipGxXXtKbWSWrmNa3E5riSfOMI6MhO48OiLhA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(396003)(346002)(366004)(33656002)(66946007)(7696005)(66556008)(66446008)(52536014)(55016002)(8936002)(76116006)(71200400001)(5660300002)(66476007)(64756008)(478600001)(8676002)(6666004)(86362001)(2906002)(316002)(53546011)(66574015)(9686003)(110136005)(83380400001)(6506007)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 06064ccd-0eec-4125-d5e5-08d85e209d21
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Sep 2020 11:22:23.9490 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: wzUHdoG8DwWcJ/GQ5XdxarSMs6TOL62uCiWuIC5W2VCXSHqu/bly7/HvhiLduh549VBHsmCWPN7gFbvr5ewOjQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB4151
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/l2gnqBARqZeKk-g0A0SCcrz_gZ8>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Agenda for Monday (Re: MOP==7 live discussion )
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:22:29 -0000

All very good questions, Michael, 

And it seems that we are converging. 

I read the quasi-suggestion that we align the default for MOP 7 to whether 6LoWPAN HC is running on the medium? Looks good.

I have one last question, how does this discussion impact useofrpl and unaware-leaves, since they both define flags in the RPL DODAG config option. Should we converge the language? Do they all update RPL?

Talk to you all in a few hours,

Pascal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> Sent: lundi 21 septembre 2020 02:31
> To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>; roll@ietf.org; Ines
> Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>; Alvaro Retana
> <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
> Subject: Agenda for Monday (Re: MOP==7 live discussion )
> 
> 
> okay, here is my summary of the issues that are outstanding for roll-turnon-
> rfc8138.
> I am writing this in the hope that I've captured everything.
> 
> 1) Will RFC8138 be enabled for MOP==7?  For what media?
>    I see that my notion that it should be undefined is not reasonable, and I
>    step back from this.
> 
> 2) In what way does the format of the DIO Base Object depend upon the MOP
>    value?  It seems that we need to update 6550 to say something.
> 
> 3) While RUL document mandates that RULs must support 8138, it is not
>    clear to me if RULs can operate in a pre-8138 network. What if they
>    send 8138 compression?
>    It may be that none of the compressions that 8138 creates
>    will ever be emitted by a RUL, since they are all about IPIP compression
>    and RH3 compression, but I haven't checked.
> 
> 4) we seem to be fine for 802.15.4 networks of all sorts.
>    I suspect that we are okay for all the other layers (BTLE, DECT, BACnet)
>    that leverage rfc4944 through the various upgrades.  But, we are sure?
>    What happens on devices with multiple interfaces of different types?
>    Maybe this is an RFC8138 issue really.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email