Re: [Roll] Asynchronous PDR-ACK procedure (Was: review of dao-projection -22)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 24 February 2022 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561733A07A7 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 06:32:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eqZZnXnWL15I for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 06:32:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF523A079C for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 06:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA2D392C2 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:40:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QRbCPeLxyft0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:40:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B937D392C0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:40:47 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1645713647; bh=y0MB9T1K2Jf3OhLjG3RlroKC/CMb2VKC0pcqYTPIG6c=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=0NV8HpSY2z9HFEs8zgJovUf5XqYF6IfTc0fU2fH5UFmItKnAum+h3vEn4vRrZq9yW L6J63/5GRc8nhfM+eblxhzoURT+Qk0lDS9n1Tkb0pOk1ELe3EW1us0Mrf+dWYbblu6 wTyVRYEWMuWHlKqn514j5WidGg8u7yKNVEtmIF5hASY8VHp3JJdf2sbSHNZTTdPjD+ c2eLa7U9NBuVp38Yl5r5RZ+cmch4I/J7hEh7k3LitSCnZPevNmhBnqGmj0XUTUM/97 /bbLfkmPL/E9OSFDORztFHlXyNU00/5UFeHM0zLYBqL8xeLxdsUYCAXEZdKmlLLZ06 taCfwyWRDPAXg==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7CE65 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:32:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB488134F9D76184A3880CECBED83D9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CO1PR11MB48814F2E0935FE03CC5D1271D8549@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CO1PR11MB488134F9D76184A3880CECBED83D9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:32:10 -0500
Message-ID: <12365.1645713130@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/lAW_c2K2x4X1DXQZWh8rC2qWhyE>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Asynchronous PDR-ACK procedure (Was: review of dao-projection -22)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 14:32:34 -0000

Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\) <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > This is now issue 12 in github
    > https://github.com/roll-wg/dao-projection/issues/12

    > I see the power of an async PDR ack but have no use case for it. The
    > question was sent to the list a month ago and there was no suggestion;
    > I propose that we hold the odea for the day we need it and keep things
    > ass is for now.

Depends upon whether the root is sure that the PDR is actually supported by
that node.  Surely the node could also be out of resources and can't
implement the PDR?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide