IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 August 2014 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F4B1A00D7; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lpBM8bC73jLx; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85F51A00E6; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id j5so9434151qga.1 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3Q5zBVkMJA3QW5n+26VXwUczY9lgy1b3mn+s2DlhXQk=; b=sAWn4Wq+L6o7vtbE0tRDVR2oka/4pEdr0kkN3Cg5Xa1F00xTnvhuB1tCLA3D9pv7SY JD/lK3n2qM9irU+cvsn5OLjHwAEgIF1oNCdAWCoE8YhasaveFep8jastxhIEejEQd43D nk8yiGIc3H09fNAwJjswaYdNHVRvJ37yWoron6M+bYWVZ16Q53qnwHDsa0FASORWtsmc qgkAzzoQcD4aWvx+UdM3zOnpZXb2NgNe7PWTCqqEHxlPhHHGKxO+WC2snA9zMkt0eOPp huf6HqYPxCKBdIpz1hOgUPYukQFAz8M1x7Xly++U5VmMPVv3v0TcREIGkLmXM5NlvgKm DKzw==
X-Received: by 10.224.11.9 with SMTP id r9mr23103790qar.43.1407175843072; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.82.101.21] (rtp-isp-nat1.cisco.com. [64.102.254.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s7sm8832174qgd.20.2014.08.04.11.10.41 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D189A1@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 14:10:40 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <406B5D64-4F0E-4E71-BC60-A113FB367652@gmail.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D189A1@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/lHTN2xrlbdcBkkRQt2Qcw0W7_CU
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 18:10:53 -0000

On Aug 4, 2014, at 2:01 PM 8/4/14, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> The change is now done, Ralph.
> 
> The only difference between draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03 and draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-04 is 
> 
> Updates: 6437 (if approved)

I suggest adding a section to your doc that explains exactly what is being updated in RFC 6437.

- Ralph

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Pascal
> 
> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Droms
> Sent: samedi 2 août 2014 22:57
> To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
> Cc: Michael Richardson; ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 2, 2014, at 4:48 PM, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
> That sounds right, Michael, 
> 
> I agree that "updates 6437" is a right thing to do.
> 
> though slightly on the overkill side. 
> 
> I disagree that it is overkill.  In my opinion, draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-RPL pretty clearly contradicts RFC 6437, so "updates 6437" is an appropriate action.
> 
>  And this is consistent with what Brian suggested. This can be added during the rfc editor process I expect?
> 
> It should be added as soon as possible, certainly before it goes to the IESG.  In my opinion, the change might warrant a new or extended WGLC; that action is up to the chairs, of course.
> 
> - Ralph
> 
> 
> Pascal
> 
> Le 2 août 2014 à 21:09, "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> a écrit :
> 
> 
> Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
> OTOH you need to understand that there is no need for a bis to update a
> MUST in an RFC. We recognize the imperfection in our work and are
> always ready to revise and amend after due consideration.
> 
> Perhaps this document UPDATES 6437 then?
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status