Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-18

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 07 October 2020 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332C93A00E5 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 05:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=EEWD59Em; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=uAUtIwmm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sSXIWOhmv-0E for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 05:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83F9B3A00E0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 05:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2335; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1602075475; x=1603285075; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=sYo4gFyt/tv8EzbLKrSTZg0XEJQgaG82C4kUeoeme08=; b=EEWD59Emgs7eavNnO7v30nU1tcCIoece//4qUbjvFJNj8uAPl1yGvh6L f6w7pMdSSZbgEIcuZ2QJ0QrFDZfO2GEbmweHbfcYy3t33yPOykiR2eVx3 AYn0/bIhw0nTGKj2uVA99CEC3xzhzCcqIvQKURa0QIJXwVNjZ+9B6fL9U M=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:KG5Bmhyp72sEqsDXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRWFt/RgkFGPWp/UuLpIiOvT5qbnX2FIoZOMq2sLf5EEURgZwd4XkAotDI/gawX7IffmYjZ8EJFEU1lorHC2LUYTH9zxNBXep3So5msUHRPyfQN+OuXyHNvUiMK6n+C/8pHeeUNGnj24NLhzNx6x6w7Ws5ob
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DVCAB+un1f/4cNJK1gHgEBCxIMQIFEC4FSUQeBSS8siAMDjXKKEY5qglMDVQsBAQENAQEtAgQBAYRKAoIHAiU3Bg4CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVwMhXIBAQEBAxIoBgEBOAsEAgEIEQQBAQEeECERHQgCBAESCBqFUAMuAZ5LAoE5iGF0gTSDAQEBBYUkDQuCEAmBOIJyhHGFUBuBQT+BEUOCTT6CGoIFIINIgi2QD6Z7UgqCaJVchS2hLZMajVuSQAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaiSBV3AVgyRQFwINjh+DcYpWdDcCBgoBAQMJfI1MAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,346,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="576216910"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 07 Oct 2020 12:57:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 097CvswQ007333 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:57:54 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 07:57:54 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:57:53 -0400
Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 07:57:53 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZbYkscwe/SWY49w9alklxjQ/4jF00iw+GwGna4s+BhfBi9Qogy2T50vJws2qhNApLCYUVU0Qa1yzkpMGzXIcJC8WBp6CYPoEUoBwECFM6IpqBjziHObIEcJkCVH57boDmsmxCiuoB6S51YPjemUZnf/ncX4Ly1Lun6VPSQ/w6wZZoPaEZUsZzlLgb44YbGs+2pWDp3MS9ltRGrtYCCx2kKw+O2ZRMNLxIhbJEqa+JUqErmJTQ4UuNrFJA7/riKXFLktd0qEGyAEAW/Dnoi8SVxPczN/lZj+oBDeTPwTB0KFD08/rmQwd/q9A0L68tgf+WDnVFu28eaSeYyhlNmUJFA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=V/H9iyeLRac0nkzhOYAkIb/2l9DepbZ3P5PYrZHad8A=; b=VzIGSyNE6Vw5TrZnoE5YEzQXxbHKEZyAEs8qj/7PDNzAefmyJLj4PA56OiSpFtBUSKk0xYTu+hUCoiyQH/DiIcVhH6NJTVrZWrV5cG/vpyrfwpG65TJ1HAXUyzVIFCKeacJSKLEcxOcd/QqgawYN6x2j3GnUlCULwqp4khNh8A6zRxFWtLP63gzYa+4raF+DhTVtLk/GBpaP/UZEbudwS22qqAJ1v8X87/9g46LNxmjGmo7lwbP8LBXUL9yJMwPiPvC4cAFe2Q9rEdxc3qM+6NwbTXo/cH+7JLPZeirqknQGP+FMtF/hkda3olB0ck7JD2gdSd8F5a1BlCSnuoe68g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=V/H9iyeLRac0nkzhOYAkIb/2l9DepbZ3P5PYrZHad8A=; b=uAUtIwmmwBv4Hxeh6pVnsNNKHl/0IGUwqBUCW+DNaAVMsc+7M5zzWTl22Z2Z+KayyQ+XJJUryN+aQ3XRelwhULZ2rQd52RfRIPEGpDN0FXvawJBgU8anILURH8RGqs99UGj21ji88JvkUUVtBvIY6fnCoORgelsmRbhWQ10xcZw=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ea::31) by MN2PR11MB3582.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ec::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3433.38; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:57:52 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::119:f851:5860:da95]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::119:f851:5860:da95%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3455.021; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:57:52 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-18
Thread-Index: AQHWnAqcalhvjJ/sXE2H4yIAHvyldqmK4yaAgAAEQYCAAGQKAIAAe62ggABNWDA=
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 12:57:27 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:56:42 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB3565771702FEF558F337BB87D80A0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAMMESszw4SuUQtchiqk-o7Z=62X+U2af4==X5S_=rJ-3y4Dn=w@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB356593481245BC85A03D4003D83F0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxgYifi+U=fTdFk5Fz+a1ArbFUzxBbeDeORhk30n2N3Ew@mail.gmail.com> <29990.1602008535@localhost> <CAMMESsx88Xj1Zb8cC8Y6QSfsYvpANAh4ONjaOyCMf0XvKh893w@mail.gmail.com> <24976.1602030932@localhost> <MN2PR11MB35655B010613D0A1C852F203D80A0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35655B010613D0A1C852F203D80A0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a01:cb1d:4ec:2200:18ab:7e72:d975:eeda]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 292cedf3-ac8e-471b-379e-08d86ac09a31
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3582:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB35829B3704AB5DC95B4559D0D80A0@MN2PR11MB3582.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: J2Vljt/uxsOc1mU/bf7dzmwZqiNEgzRBJ4IB0ZFNK21qrjJwAh6bNIkqromGmasWBMDlo2vQhBGKuvaF3E0Z8BlK+m15e0CBP7ijV4CzjKfYq1dutk59LCTS9xSnXhWs25yISnTQcBiXuFx5BzDu6iaOgLLenfxOk242Rrom5XMxffXyiNOQi0fV5P02rZz9tPP8ljlemiHGiK6IekIVt3XFA8/VSuMJEtAEhfB1DhoYPvixws9d3JpiJF4BDTcyhv02bXfbXAPHlqDH2ynppCM6EtbTL8+92+rBNK694IIFu6iOnJ4/UdTmrzIC2DvuaXkquxYEdTDCDxmuXF7Tig==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(346002)(136003)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(66556008)(66476007)(2940100002)(7696005)(5660300002)(478600001)(33656002)(71200400001)(83380400001)(66574015)(8936002)(8676002)(9686003)(76116006)(66946007)(86362001)(6666004)(110136005)(6506007)(53546011)(186003)(52536014)(316002)(66446008)(2906002)(55016002)(64756008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: Yj5kKJc0PAtPp+ZemBPUHOjUxOAQ2Mq0pZr+F2YsTkFwuRI+X41iF4RQqrj56QPcb/Ou7QS+TuTUYvoinHDKKE6hxvV3ZxewR2bbZB4gEwilXyRMPTyjJKU9bWbupFa/jgUz9xVEB8QnPb+HEOT5Zpl4vvad+uvDz8OdmVetB5lWalxo8+Hdn7F1iZyRxSBUsP//k4Kkum5mRuhtqn8mNKjY8A/JksvFcWnvPlBV613x4ZEwmODIABNQ8NyFOsSSgO+hRilwGfIpeNM1VYvYUE7lUlF3Ry7KOiXKJPsnFuKJPz9+/rs6V3kpE3O1bSmB+MRnXZ/IqdDPNjot4BMiEa85IkpNgK+djsBsZ7x2jVlilqog8nVrbaFmPvsN7LNDadfYeDJlLJ7p8lMkjP4XeKX1wZdefEHhNz5CBtvEGzGDNCIonHeZziUu4I2UkGiodzS0IKL5sQEzn60jH/cBMCX/bigorMwgtRGDFiPel5ZpppqJCl0G/7wMt4E8GYgZmqP3MnivXJB5S/idWQ3/+JX/ldGsbmbC8a+hQsQagSjBFN3L/7DSQuqdINLd6lTwSY3h7XFwwFxqyGxLJ697P1rABIKTgU52pZm0G70kD5gBWehlppPVTG3RIE5mqiT/reMyQS2OOVPXF0nyspZg5VFA67/w64+FOxVCMPsZh75mL27zqQfseh7Ak0KaE1fTCPLeT6OBypo8CKLT3segXQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 292cedf3-ac8e-471b-379e-08d86ac09a31
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Oct 2020 12:57:52.5117 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 5EbMdqlMdH8dwQVuCiuXpLcWGPKhfuCO3jA7ztmw5ocbOPXrtkc6Bb3AwtAfd4TAj7gnBdR72DEftKtBtxZXsg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3582
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/lHUGyqcSWao1Z4n4j_YmNnFI_Ms>
Subject: Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-18
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 12:57:59 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
> Sent: mercredi 7 octobre 2020 10:00
> To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>; Alvaro
> Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-18
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> > Sent: mercredi 7 octobre 2020 02:36
> > To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>; Routing Over Low power and
> > Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-18
> >
> >
> > Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >     >> So, yes, a RUL has to be aware of this document, and RFC8505, but it
> >     >> does need to speak RPL.
> >
> >     > s/does/does not
> >
> > ARGH.
> >
> > So, yes, a RUL has to be aware of this document, and RFC8505, but it
> > does not need to speak RPL.
> 
> Exactly!
> 
I already had acted on this but I understand it was not enough; So let me propose the additional diff (which is on the first mention of a RUL)

OLD

   [USEofRPLinfo] introduces the terms RPL-Aware-Leaf (RAL) and RPL-
   Unaware Leaf (RUL).  A RAL is a Leaf that injects Host routes in RPL
   to manage the reachability of its IPv6 addresses.  Conversely, a RUL
   does not participate to RPL and cannot inject its Host routes in RPL.
   The RUL therefore needs a Host-to-Router interface to advertise its
   IPv6 addresses to its access Router so the Router can inject them the
   RPL network on its behalf.  Section 5 details the interface needed by
   a router that implements this specification.

NEW

   [USEofRPLinfo] introduces the terms RPL-Aware-Leaf (RAL) and RPL-
   Unaware Leaf (RUL).  A RAL is a Leaf that injects Host routes in RPL
   to manage the reachability of its IPv6 addresses.  Conversely, a RUL
   does not participate to RPL and cannot inject routes.  Section 5
   details a Host-to-Router interface that the RUL needs to implement to
   advertise its IPv6 addresses to a Router that supports this
   specification.  The document specifies how the Router injects those
   addresses as Host Routes in the RPL network on behalf of the RUL.

Works?

Pascal