Re: [Roll] reminder - end of second WG LC

[JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>]

No, both documents are still under WG Last call.

Thanks.

JP.

On May 24, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:

> JP:
>  
> I find that draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12 is ready for IESG review.
> Thanks a bunch to the authors and, in particular, to Mukul for all this hard work.
>  
> Cheers,
>  
> Pascal
>  
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur
> Sent: mercredi 23 mai 2012 23:44
> To: roll WG
> Cc: Michael Richardson
> Subject: [Roll] reminder - end of second WG LC
>  
> Second last call on
>  
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05 and 
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12
>  
> will end May 25th at noon ET, just a reminder.
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> JP.
>  
> On May 11, 2012, at 2:20 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear all,
>  
> A first WG Last Call took place on March 16th on:
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-04 and 
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-09
>  
> Thanks to all of you for the fruitful and constructive comments received during WG Last call, that led 
> to several tickets that have been successfully closed, leading to new revisions of these documents.
>  
> This starts a new 2-week WG last call on:
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05 and 
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12
>  
> The WG Last call will end on May 25th at noon ET. Please send your comments on the mailing list and copy the authors.
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> JP and Michael.  
>  
>  
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> 
> From: Thomas Heide Clausen <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update
> Date: April 13, 2012 11:21:00 PM GMT+02:00
> To: JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>
> Cc: "[e-mail] WG" <[e-mail]>
>  
> Dear JP,
>  
> Sounds quite reasonable.
>  
> Have a pleasant weekend you too - I will be spending mine recovering from week-long meetings in the bay area...
>  
> Best,
>  
> Thomas
>  
> On Apr 13, 2012, at 14:16 , JP Vasseur wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Thomas,
>  
> Clarifying a bit more … what I meant …
>  
> Plan is:
> * Close on the last open ticket
> * Authors will post a new revision of the document, possibly highlighting the changes
> * Issue another WG LC to make sure that the WG is comfortable with the new revision
>  
> Thanks, have a good week-end.
>  
> JP.
>  
> On Apr 13, 2012, at 9:03 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Thomas,
>  
> Absolutely, the plan was to run another incremental Last Call, on the new revision.
>  
> Cheers.
>  
> JP.
>  
> On Apr 13, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello folks,
> 
> I've been trying to follow the many mails exchanged as a consequence of the WGLC of RPL-P2P.
> 
> Given the volume of changes to the document, I would like to ask that - once the authors estimate that a version of the I-D folding in all proposed changes is ready - the WG be given another 1-2 weeks WGLC before bouncing it off to the ADs?
> 
> This just to ensure that the WG gets to give the final version a good review before seeing it off.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Thomas
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Heide Clausen
> http://www.thomasclausen.org/
> 
> "Any simple problem can be made insoluble if enough meetings are held to
> discuss it."
>   -- Mitchell's Law of Committees
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>