[Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-10.txt

Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Mon, 01 April 2013 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=79604f80b=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550F411E80E7 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 12:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hDe2BSup8VCD for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 12:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip4mta.uwm.edu (ip4mta.uwm.edu [129.89.7.194]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E9A11E80E6 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 12:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqIEAG++WVF/AAAB/2dsb2JhbABDgztBgl+8LoESgxMBAQEEAQEBIEs3BAEBAwINGQIpJgIIBhMJiAsHBZ9sjlWJAIkPgSOMXX0pEgaCJ4ETA4h6jXGBH49sgymCCg
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta02.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260362E0F1C for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:13:37 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from mta02.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta02.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ykZKZhVkYFn for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:13:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.177]) by mta02.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C524D2E0F2C for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:13:36 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:13:36 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: roll < roll@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2092984169.330874.1364843616693.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20130401180007.18866.32700.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [99.20.249.193]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.15_GA_2995 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Win)/6.0.15_GA_2995)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Subject: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-10.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:13:40 -0000

Hi all

This version contains the following changes made in response to IESG comments:

1. The Address vector must now consist of global or unique local IPv6 addresses only. Further, we now explicitly require the addresses in the Address vector to be the ones with same (elided) prefix as the Start Point Address and End Point Address.
 
2. The Start Point Address and End Point Address now have to be global or unique local.

3. Section 3.2 (Secure MO): The Start Point decides whether Secure MOs should be used and the Security Configuration to be used for the purpose. All the Intermediate Points and the End Point MUST use the same Security Configuration as the one used by the Start Point.

4. Section 4.4: Previously, we required the use of binary 10000000 as the RPLInstanceID value whenever the route being measured was a Source Route. But, there was no real reason to do so. So, the new version explicitly states that RPLInstanceID "field does not have any significance when a Source Route is being measured and hence can be set to any value."

5. Section 8 (Security Considerations) has been updated based on the changes done in Section 3.2.

6. Minor editorial changes.

In my opinion, these changes do not affect how this mechanism is to be used in real use-cases.

Thanks
Mukul



----- Forwarded Message -----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2013 1:00:07 PM
Subject: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-10.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : A Mechanism to Measure the Routing Metrics along a Point-to-point Route in a Low Power and Lossy Network
	Author(s)       : Mukul Goyal
                          Emmanuel Baccelli
                          Anders Brandt
                          Jerald Martocci
	Filename        : draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-10.txt
	Pages           : 28
	Date            : 2013-04-01

Abstract:
   This document specifies a mechanism that enables an RPL router to
   measure the aggregated values of given routing metrics along an
   existing route towards another RPL router, thereby allowing the
   router to decide if it wants to initiate the discovery of a better
   route.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-10

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-10


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll