From nobody Fri Nov 13 00:26:00 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BAC3A1636 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:25:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kydGIpqOspN3 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:25:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vs1-xe29.google.com (mail-vs1-xe29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B313A1635 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:25:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe29.google.com with SMTP id m16so4793197vsl.8 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:25:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Xa3/JzyPSObx2ntZ8/lYVPPtoovB+9vqxUn2sfV64NY=; b=P4YM1/o2KOSF/thu6qgiJX+xqk1vnxrcAovVihiUzo3CdVPQwnFVNHhdqNohMHinNB ImB2OcUswen//2SJRSwVD+8hX6dsW3j1qVzRdK9umFp+5tZ/oiK/Ux/cMRf3lKOqsxsM GIdHsx3wBJSao5HTunX20cQk9eloMsRivPzxBA55ZEMr1rrobxLhIfzMdkWevjfWi0rP NHj5KxnpU9BQeWhy9FF4xoevUvhG3L421krvnqeFAx8HB9hFGe3eb5BBh7p6Xc6rhENV eeJG4ye0wHGXVBUyi2+iq/NozkQGQVfln4ag6bd6TVVC/IfLvWf3WC00G3p3qBxkgRh8 k1Xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Xa3/JzyPSObx2ntZ8/lYVPPtoovB+9vqxUn2sfV64NY=; b=VjQkFO+juRFJj7ntuXSqTAjDUP4CFh97eL2yLtbcePQVizIwWQihpp72FF9UOY7BXQ tcX/H3yF6ODP54vTlptJHmbZiM+jg8jAvm4uRv8ZYDReGkbiHKtQQguDc7F+AfBHXLW9 x70MWXE/ORfm7sW7aAz8Wq+p13sK4qPc3wmd9M/08ZrAuCj5A7Y057lD9d6k5QPUcfLC cDsMY2MgHR6Zcf3fBmavN50Rv+TO6PMptmKjIn56Yi/X+G/ydEhi0t/OccUgvvRoLqxG tVGiRi3j34PfoDYSLX2LW0MV7aCT5R7SPLrATWJbmapw57LgjEmWErtxOV4ISBooo7i7 jN4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GUzhQh1X6Vuy3EBnMmGyQSRPwzbj4pNDkkjgWrDUHdeQQrgjO w0HUnk99cOrBBhtQV7Bj7EatJ9AWblyZczDg4mRGixaoMcE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpHBL4gkeb1QZBe6q2dnig+QUD64y5eBVbGpk9+Dn6zKAol0QPL1Z5SOrY4LNDyfDbAGGY2LFULaInzWVJr2M= X-Received: by 2002:a67:ec9a:: with SMTP id h26mr534771vsp.34.1605255955013; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:25:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <23007.1604344604@localhost> In-Reply-To: From: Ines Robles Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:25:19 +0200 Message-ID: To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8e5ac05b3f8c65d" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Roll] IETF 109 - Agenda Requests X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:25:58 -0000 --000000000000f8e5ac05b3f8c65d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all, Please find an updated agenda for IETF 109: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/agenda-109-roll-03 Comments welcome, Thanks, Ines and Dominique On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:39 PM Ines Robles wrote: > Hi, > > Great!, we have 30 min slot-free, thus RFC6550bis would have 40 min if > there are no further meeting requests. > > Thank you, > > Ines. > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:16 PM Michael Richardson > wrote: > >> >> Ines Robles wrote: >> > - RPLv2 status (10 min) >> >> Who is doing this? [was it me?] >> I don't think that 10 minutes is enough. >> >> Rather than talk about RPLv2, let's talk about planning for RFC6550bis. >> I think that needs a bunch of planning. >> >> -- >> Michael Richardson . o O ( IPv6 I=C3=B8T consu= lting >> ) >> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Roll mailing list >> Roll@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll >> > --000000000000f8e5ac05b3f8c65d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear all,

Please find an updated agenda= for IETF 109:=C2=A0=C2=A0https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/m= aterials/agenda-109-roll-03

Comments welcome,<= /div>

Thanks,

Ines and Dominiqu= e

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:39 PM Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> wrote:=
Hi,=C2=A0

Great!, we have 30 min slot-free, thus=C2=A0 RFC6550bis=C2=A0 would have 40 min if there are no further meeting requests= .=C2=A0

Thank you,=C2=A0

= Ines.

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:16 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=3D40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 > - RPLv2 status (10 min)

Who is doing this? [was it me?]
I don't think that 10 minutes is enough.

Rather than talk about RPLv2, let's talk about planning for RFC6550bis.=
I think that needs a bunch of planning.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>=C2=A0 =C2=A0. o O ( IPv6 I=C3=B8T co= nsulting )
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Sandelman Software Works Inc, Otta= wa and Worldwide




_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
--000000000000f8e5ac05b3f8c65d--